Writ Dismissed as Facts Disputed | HC on Article 226
- Blog|News|GST & Customs|
- < 1 minute
- By Taxmann
- |
- Last Updated on 30 July, 2025

Case Details: Akshat Steel vs. State of Chhattisgarh - [2025] 176 taxmann.com 654 (Chhattisgarh)
Judiciary and Counsel Details
- Ramesh Sinha, CJ and Bibhu Datta Guru, J.
- Rajat Agrawal, Adv. for the Petitioner.
- Y.S. Thakur, Addl. Advocate General and Animesh Tiwari, Adv. for the Respondent.
Fact of the Case
The petitioner filed a writ of mandamus seeking clearance of an admissible amount along with GST and interest. The dispute pertained to demand not involving fraud or suppression. The authorities disputed the petitioner’s entitlement to such amount, raising contested factual issues. The matter was accordingly placed before the High Court for consideration under Article 226 of the Constitution
HC Held
The Court dismissed the writ petition, holding that the presence of disputed questions of fact bars the exercise of jurisdiction under Article 226. Relying on the ruling in Sai Info Services v. State of Chhattisgarh [2025] 176 taxmann.com 699 (Chhatisgarh), it was observed that such disputes must be adjudicated before appropriate statutory authorities and not under writ jurisdiction.
List of Cases Reviewed
List of Cases Referred
Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.

Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.
The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:
- The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
- All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
- Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
- Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
- All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
- The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
- Font and size that’s easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied

CA | CS | CMA