Petitioners Must Exhaust DRT Remedy Before Challenging Sec. 14 Order | Writ Challenging Order Was to Be Dismissed | HC
- Blog|News|FEMA & Banking|
- 2 Min Read
- By Taxmann
- |
- Last Updated on 31 January, 2024
Latest from Taxmann
Case Details: Rajesh Agrawal v. State of Madhya Pradesh - [2024] 158 taxmann.com 652 (Madhya Pradesh)
Judiciary and Counsel Details
-
- Sushrut Arvind Dharmadhikari & Devnarayan Mishra, JJ.
- Ravindra Martand Deshpande, Adv. for the Appellant.
- Bhuwan Gautam, Adv. for the Respondent.
Facts of the Case
In the instant case, the loan was obtained by the petitioner from the respondent bank. In order to secure said loan, the petitioner mortgaged his subject immovable property.
Loan having remained unpaid, the bank had invoked provisions of the SARFAESI Act, 2002 and had filed an application under section 14 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002 to take possession of secured assets, which was allowed by the District Collector.
The Petitioner filed an instant writ alleging that before passing the impugned order, the District Collector did not provide the opportunity of hearing to him as well as the borrowed amount was below the ceiling limit to attract recovery actions under provisions of the 2002 Act and therefore, actions of respondent was against provisions of law.
It was an admitted position that an order under Section 14 had been passed by the Additional Collector and now petitioners being borrowers had an alternative remedy to approach DRT by filing an appropriate application which had not been filed.
High Court Held
Thus, the High Court held that the instant writ challenging the execution of the order under section 14 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002 was to be dismissed as all points raised in the writ could very well be raised before DRT.
List of Cases Reviewed
-
- Kalabharti Advertising v. Hemant Vimalnath Narichania and Others (2010) 9 SCC 437 (para 10)
- South Indian Bank Ltd. & Ors. v. Naveen Mathew Philip & Anr. etc [2023 Livelaw (SC) 320 (para 11) followed.
Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.
Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.
The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:
- The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
- All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
- Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
- Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
- All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
- The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
- Font and size that’s easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied
Sign Up
To subscribe to our weekly newsletter please log in/register on Taxmann.com
Latest Books
Everything on Tax and Corporate Laws of India
To subscribe to our weekly newsletter please log in/register on Taxmann.com
