Petitioner Not Liable for Bounced Cheque Issued by Brother From His Account | Complaint u/s 138 to Be Dismissed | HC

  • Blog|News|FEMA & Banking|
  • 2 Min Read
  • By Taxmann
  • |
  • Last Updated on 22 December, 2023

complaint u/s 138 of the Negotiable Instruments

Case Details: Arushi Gupta v. Ajay Chanana - [2023] 157 taxmann.com 460 (Delhi)

Judiciary and Counsel Details

    • Saurabh Banerjee, J.
    • Raghav SharmaAnkit Kumar, Advs. for the Petitioner.
    • Vikas Khatri, Adv. for the Respondent.

Facts of the Case

In the instant case, the Petitioner along with her brother was a director, shareholder and authorized representative of an entity. A cheque was issued by brother of petitioner in favour of complainant in discharge of some liability.

However, said cheque was dishonored due to ‘Payment stopped by drawer’. Legal notice was served upon petitioner and her brother, however, they failed to make payment within stipulated period.

Hence, complainant proceeded with filing of a complaint under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 against petitioner and other accused persons.

Consequently, the Petitioner filed instant petition under section 482 seeking to quash said complaint. Further, it was noted that impugned cheque had not been issued/drawn by petitioner and it had been issued by her brother from his bank account wherein petitioner was not an account holder.

Further, the respondent had not filed any complaint against said entity where petitioner and her brother were director/shareholder.

High Court Held

The High Court observed that petitioner had hardly any role to play qua cheque involved in instant dispute and could not be held liable for something not concerning her and, thus, she could not have been made an accused in complaint filed by respondent.

Therefore, the High Court held that complaint filed by complainant against petitioner and other accused was to be quashed qua petitioner.

Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Everything on Tax and Corporate Laws of India

To subscribe to our weekly newsletter please log in/register on Taxmann.com

Author: Taxmann

Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.

The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:

  • The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
  • All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
  • Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
  • Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
  • All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
  • The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
  • Font and size that's easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied