No Violation of Natural Justice if SCN Served by Email | HC
- News|Blog|GST & Customs|
- 2 Min Read
- By Taxmann
- |
- Last Updated on 13 October, 2025

Case Details: DK Enterprises vs. Union of India - [2025] 178 taxmann.com 752 (Delhi)
Judiciary and Counsel Details
- Prathiba M. Singh & Shail Jain, JJ.
- Viraj Datar,
- Viraj Datar, Sr. Adv., Kartik Jindal, Ms. Palak Gupta and Rajiv Sorihi, Advs. for the Petitioner.
- Ms. Anushree Narain, SSC, Naman Choula, Ms. Khushi Ramuka, Advs. and Siddhartha Shankar Ray, CGSC for the Respondent.
Facts of the Case
The petitioner, a registered assessee under GST, was issued a show cause notice (SCN) through e-mail alleging fraudulent availment of input tax credit (ITC). The petitioner contended that the SCN and subsequent hearing notices were not uploaded on the portal, and when approached the department to file a reply, was asked to upload the response on the portal, thereby denying an opportunity to present their case. The petitioner argued that the impugned order should be set aside due to violation of principles of natural justice. The legal issue arising was whether service of SCN by e-mail, coupled with the assessee’s awareness of proceedings, constituted a breach of natural justice and whether writ jurisdiction could be invoked to challenge the impugned order. The matter was accordingly placed before the High Court.
High Court Held
The High Court held that there was no violation of natural justice as the SCN was served by e-mail and the assessee had complete knowledge of the proceedings. The Court noted that a detailed departmental analysis demonstrated that the assessee intended to fraudulently avail ITC and pass it on through a network of dummy entities. The impugned order was accessible to the assessee well before the filing of the writ petition, and the petitioner’s challenge was beyond the limitation period for statutory appeal. The Court permitted the assessee to pursue the statutory remedy of appeal under Section 16, read with Section 107, of Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017/Delhi Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017.
List of Cases referred to
- Asstt. Commissioner of State Tax v. Commercial Steel Limited [2021] 130 taxmann.com 180/88 GST 799/52 GSTL 385 (SC) (para 19),
- Elesh Aggarwal v. Union of India [Writ Tax No. 753 of 2023, dated 31-5-2023] (para 20)
- Sheetal and Sons v. Union of India [2025] 175 taxmann.com 597 (Delhi) (para 20).
Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.

Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.
The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:
- The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
- All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
- Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
- Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
- All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
- The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
- Font and size that’s easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied

CA | CS | CMA