No provision in Benami law for assessee to cross-examine witnesses in preliminary stage: HC

  • Blog|News|Income Tax|
  • 2 Min Read
  • By Taxmann
  • |
  • Last Updated on 23 February, 2023

cross examination in Benami law

Case Details: Marg Projects and Infrastructure Ltd. v. Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax - [2023] 147 130 (Madras)

Judiciary and Counsel Details

    • R. Mahadevan & J. Sathya Narayana Prasad, JJ.
    • R. Sivaraman for the Appellant.
    • Ms Sheela, Special Public Prosecutor (Income Tax) for the Respondent.

Facts of the Case

Assessee-company was engaged in the business of real estate and developing infrastructure projects including ports, SEZ’s, hotels, malls, etc. A search was conducted in the business premises of the assessee.

After search, a notice under section 24 was issued under the Prohibition of Benami Property Transactions Act, 1988 considering the assessee as a benamidar of shares held by it. In response, the assessee furnished the required documents. Not satisfied with the response and without providing any opportunity for the assessee to cross-examine the witnesses, the Deputy Commissioner attached the assessee’s property.

Considering such an act as a violation of the principles of natural justice, the assessee preferred a writ petition to the Madras High Court.

High Court Held

The High Court held that the applicability of the principles of natural justice and fair play depends on the facts and circumstances of each case and is subjected to statutory provisions. The commissioner issued notices to the assessee containing reasons for forming an opinion wherein the assessee was allowed to furnish the documents to prove the genuineness of the transactions. However, the assessee failed to produce the documents called for and thus it couldn’t be said that there was no fair play on the part of the commissioner.

Section 24 of the Benami Act only requires forming a prima facie opinion to consider any transaction in the nature of Benami. After making all the enquiries and considering all the documents furnished by the assessee, with the prior approval of the Approving Authority, an attachment order was passed. There is no provision to cross-examine the witnesses and provide the opportunity of being heard to the assessee at the preliminary stage under the Benami Act.

It is to be pointed out that the exercise of cross-examination commences only after the proceedings for adjudication have commenced and thus a writ petition should not be entertained against a mere show cause notice.

Therefore, the commissioner’s act was purely provision in nature and the plea raised by the assessee cannot be countenanced.

List of Cases Reviewed

List of Cases Referred to

    • K.L. Tripathi v. State Bank of India AIR 1984 SC 273 (para 12)
    • CCE v. Parmarth Iron (P.) Ltd. [Special Appeal No. 741 of 2010, dated 29-11-2010] (para 12)
    • Century NF Castings v. Union of India 2011 (269) ELT 221/2011 SCC Online P&H 17614 (para 12)
    • Arun Kumar Mishra v. Union of India 2014 SCC Online Delhi 493 (para 12)
    • Kailash Assudani v. CIT [2017] 87 361 (M.P.) (para 12)
    • Kailash Assudani v. CIT [W.A. No. 704 of 2017, dated 16-8-2017] (para 12).

Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Everything on Tax and Corporate Laws of India

To subscribe to our weekly newsletter please log in/register on

Author: Taxmann

Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.

The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:

  • The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
  • All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
  • Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
  • Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
  • All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
  • The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
  • Font and size that's easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied