No Detention by Transit State Officers Without Jurisdiction | HC

  • News|Blog|GST & Customs|
  • 2 Min Read
  • By Taxmann
  • |
  • Last Updated on 4 May, 2026

Latest from Taxmann

GST transit state detention

Case Details: Golden Traders vs. Deputy Assistant Commissioner of State Tax - [2026] 185 taxmann.com 569 (Andhra Pradesh)

Judiciary and Counsel Details

  • R. Raghunandan Rao & T.C.D. Sekhar, JJ.
  • P. Girish Kumar, V. Raghuraman, M.V.J.K. Kumar, Pasupuleti Venkata Prasad, Sameer Gupta & Akula Vamsi Krishna, Ld. Counsels for the Petitioner.
  • R. Kalyan Chakravarthy, Ld. Govt. Pleader for the Respondent.

Facts of the Case

The petitioners, engaged in inter-state trade and transportation of goods, challenged interception proceedings initiated by officers during transit. The officers detained the consignments invoking the Section 129 of the CGST Act, and in several instances proceeded to confiscation under Section 130, contending that they were competent ‘proper officers’ even in respect of goods merely passing through the State. It was submitted that except in one case alleging absence of invoices and e-way bills, the consignments were accompanied by requisite statutory documents, and that the proceedings were nevertheless initiated on grounds such as alleged undervaluation, mismatch in description, and minor quantity variations. The petitioners contended that, even if assumed, such discrepancies did not indicate any intent to evade tax. The matter was accordingly placed before the High Court.

High Court Held

The High Court held that the cross-empowerment mechanism under Section 6 of the CGST Act, read with Section 4 of the IGST Act, applied only in respect of taxpayers administratively assigned to the respective state authorities, and not to inter-state consignments merely transiting through a state without any tax revenue allocation. It further held that officers of an intermediary State could not assume jurisdiction to levy penalties, appropriate goods, or initiate confiscation proceedings under Section 129 or Section 130 for consignments originating and terminating outside the State. The Court observed that the role of such officers was limited to verifying documents and forwarding any discrepancies to the proper jurisdictional officers of the consignor or consignee, and that they could not undertake valuation or assessment at the interception stage. It was further held that detention or confiscation based on alleged undervaluation, description mismatch, or minor quantity variation was impermissible. Consequently, the proceedings were set aside.

List of Cases Reviewed

List of Cases Referred to

Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.

Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.

The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:

  • The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
  • All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
  • Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
  • Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
  • All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
  • The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
  • Font and size that’s easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

«
»

Everything on Tax and Corporate Laws of India

To subscribe to our weekly newsletter please log in/register on Taxmann.com

Author: Taxmann

Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.

The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:

  • The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
  • All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
  • Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
  • Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
  • All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
  • The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
  • Font and size that's easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied