NCLT passed liquidation order for CIRP without approved resolution plan by CoC: NCLAT

  • Blog|News|Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code|
  • 2 Min Read
  • By Taxmann
  • |
  • Last Updated on 21 December, 2022

liquidation order

Case Details: Rakesh Gupta v. Nitin Narang, Liquidator of Gupta Marriage Halls (P.) Ltd. - [2022] 145 taxmann.com 337 (NCLAT-New Delhi)

Judiciary and Counsel Details

    • Rakesh Kumar, Judicial Member & Dr Ashok Kumar Mishra, Technical Member
    • Vikas MehtaAshish ChoudhurySC DassAnand Kamal, Advocates for the Appellant.
    • Mohak SharmaAbhishek Anand, Advocates for the Respondent.

Facts of the Case

In the present case, the financial creditor advanced a term loan to the corporate debtor, and an overdraft was sanctioned which was enhanced from time to time. Later, an account of the corporate debtor was declared NPA and a notice under section 13(2) of the SARFAESI Act, 2002 was sent. At the request of the corporate debtor, loan was restructured.

However, despite the corporate debt’s acknowledgement, it remained outstanding, and, therefore, an application was filed under section 7 which was admitted by the NCLT and Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) was initiated against the corporate debtor.

During CIRP, since the CoC approved no resolution plan, the RP filed a petition under section 33(2) for the initiation of liquidation proceedings against the corporate debtor and same was admitted by the NCLT by the impugned order. Pursuant to which, an appeal was preferred.

On appeal, the appellant contended that the basic object of the IBC is to continue corporate debtor in running condition and liquidation is the last resort. However, the RP hurriedly approached the NCLT with a plea to initiate liquidation proceedings without taking any sincere effort to obtain an appropriate resolution plan and without approval of resolution plan approached the NCLT for liquidation in arbitrary manner and thus, the NCLT also made an error in admitting the same.

Not constituting CoC as per the provisions of the Code and Regulations made thereunder is serious contravention and not submitting reply to Board shows utter disregard and a casual approach on the part of the IRP.

NCLAT Held

Hon’ble NCLAT held that since CIRP was initiated long back and even after expiry of statutory period of 90 days no resolution plan could be approved, RP had no alternative but to proceed with the petition under section 33. Also, once RP made a prayer to liquidate the corporate debtor, NCLT had no option but to pass an order for liquidation.

Hon’ble NCLAT held that there was no error in the order passed by NCLT. Accordingly, the appeal stands dismissed without cost.

List of Cases Reviewed

    • Order of NCLT (New Delhi) in IA No. 5289(ND)/2021 in CP No. (IB) No. 979(ND) of 2019, dated 4-1-2020 (para 11) affirmed.

Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Everything on Tax and Corporate Laws of India

To subscribe to our weekly newsletter please log in/register on Taxmann.com

Author: Taxmann

Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.

The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:

  • The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
  • All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
  • Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
  • Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
  • All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
  • The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
  • Font and size that's easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied