HC Upholds Petitioner’s Arrest by ED Citing Fraud Allegations, Need for Further Investigation, and Evidence Tampering Risk

  • Blog|News|FEMA & Banking|
  • 3 Min Read
  • By Taxmann
  • |
  • Last Updated on 28 December, 2024

Section 19 of the PMLA

Case Details: Arvind Dham v. Union of India - [2024] 169 taxmann.com 564 (HC-Delhi)

Judiciary and Counsel Details

  • Anish Dayal, J.
  • Vikram ChaudhariPramod Kumar Dubey, Sr. Advs., Avi SinghShambhu K. ThakurSumer Singh BoparaiAyush PuriMs. Arveen SekhonShikhar GargAshutosh JainVinayak BhandariSirhaan SethShobh Nath MauryaRishabh BasraVishal SinghSultan JafriSidhant SaraswatAyush SachanVaibhav KapurMs. Muskan SharmaVarun Bhati, Advs. for the Petitioner.
  • Anurag Ahluwalia, CGSC, Tarveen Singh Nanda, GP, Ms Hridyanshi SharmaPranjal Tripathi, Advs., Zoheb Hossain, Spl. Counsel, Vivek Gurnani, Panel Counsel & Rakesh Kumar, IO for the Respondent.

Facts of the Case

In the instant case, the petitioner was the promoter of Amtek Group of Companies. Based on IDBI Bank’s complaint, the CBI registered an FIR against the petitioner and his company for fraud. The ED registered an ECIR against the petitioner.

The petitioner filed an instant petition challenging the validity of his arrest under Section 19 of the PMLA. It was noted that the assessment of the arresting officer that there was a necessity to arrest could not be faulted as there were substantial reasons encapsulated in grounds of arrest, which prima facie pointed to a large-scale diversion of public money through complex corporate transactions.

High Court Held

The High Court held that since at the stage of the arrest, it was evident that more investigation was required and there was a potential of tampering with evidence and dissuading persons who were associated with the company to give proper disclosures to prevent committing further offences in terms of further diversion of funds and dissipating, obscuring, and obfuscating money trail, the arrest of the petitioner was justified.

Thus, the petitioner’s arrest did not violate the provisions of Section 19, and the instant petition was to be dismissed.

List of Cases Reviewed

  • Arvind Kejriwal v. Directorate of Enforcement 2024 INSC 512 [Para 60]; followed.

List of Cases Referred to

  • Vijay Madan Lal Chaudhary v. Union of India 2022 SCC OnLine SC 929 (para 21)
  • Prem Prakash v. Union of India 2024 INSC 637 (para 21)
  • Manish Sisodia v. Directorate of Enforcement 2024 SCC OnLine SC 1920 (para 21)
  • Arvind Kejriwal v. Directorate of Enforcement 2024 INSC 512 (para 21)
  • Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar (2014) 8 SCC 273 (para 21)
  • Prabir Purkayastha v. State 2024 INSC 414 (para 21)
  • Pankaj Bansal v. Union of India 2023 SCC OnLine SC 1244 (para 21)
  • V. Senthil Balaji v. State 2023 SCC OnLine SC 934 (para 21)
  • K. Govindaraj v. Union of India 2024 SCC OnLine Mad 3500 (para 21)
  • State of Orissa v. Debendra Nath Padhi (2005) 1 SCC 568 (para 22)
  • H. N. Rishbud v. State of Delhi 1 SCR 1150 (para 22)
  • State Bank of India v. Rajesh Aggarwal & Ors. (2023) 6 SCC 1 (para 22)
  • Ram Narain Popli v. CBI AIR 2003 SC 2748 (para 22)
  • P. Chidambaram v. Directorate of Enforcement (2019) 9 SCC 24 (para 22)
  • Naser Bin Abu Bakr Yafai v. State of Maharashtra (2022) 6 SCC 308 (para 22)
  • Union of India v. Ashok Kumar Sharma & Ors. (2021) 12 SCC 674 (para 31.1)
  • Asstt. Commissioner Income Tax Rajkot v. Saurashtra Kutch Stock Exchange Limited (2008) 14 SCC 171 (para 31.1)
  • Ayya v. State of U.P. (1989) 1 SCC 374 (para 31.8)
  • Smt. Elsy George v. Union of India 2001 SCC OnLine Bom 1157 (para 31.8)
  • Madhu Garg v. Union of India (2004) 7 SCC 625 (para 31.8).

Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Everything on Tax and Corporate Laws of India

To subscribe to our weekly newsletter please log in/register on Taxmann.com

Author: Taxmann

Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.

The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:

  • The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
  • All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
  • Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
  • Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
  • All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
  • The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
  • Font and size that's easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied