HC asks CBDT to frame a scheme to train AO on how to apply mind while recording reasons
- Blog|Income Tax|News|
- 401 Views
- 2 Min Read
- By Taxmann
- Last Updated on 15 January, 2022
Judiciary and Counsel Details
- K.R. Shriram and Amit B. Borkar, JJ.
- Rohan Deshpande and Ms. Farzeen Khambatta for the petitioner.
- Sham V. Walve for the Respondents.
Facts of the Case
Assessee filed the instant writ petition before the Bombay High Court. The primary ground was that the Assessing Officer (AO) had issued a notice under section 148, and the reasons recorded for such issue of notice show total non-application of mind.
Assessee claimed that the AO does not know the meaning of the words “application of mind” because he seems to be using this expression without applying his mind. Thus, the notice & the reassessment proceedings are whole without jurisdiction, illegal, arbitrary, and liable to be quashed.
High Court Held
The Bombay High Court held that the reasons recorded for reopening assessment indicate total non-application of mind in as much as it shows the assessee to be the provider of bogus accommodation entries as well as the beneficiary of the entries. A company cannot provide bogus entry to itself, and therefore, this clearly shows total non-application of mind by the AO. Even approval for the issue of notice was granted mechanically without applying mind to reasons recorded.
Further, the AO disposed off the assessee’s objections to notice without application of mind. In the result, writ petition was allowed. AO cautioned to be careful in future. A copy of this order be also sent to the Chairman, CBDT, who may perhaps formulate a scheme whereby the officers are trained how to apply their mind and what all points should be kept in mind while recording the reasons.
The Chairman, CBDT, may also advise the concerned Commissioners not to grant approval under section 151 of the said Act mechanically but after considering the reasons carefully and scrutinizing the same.
Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.
Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.
The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:
- The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
- All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
- Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
- Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
- All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
- The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
- Font and size that’s easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied