Data Privacy Breach | Enforcement | Penalties under the DPDP Act
- Blog|Company Law|
- 4 Min Read
- By Taxmann
- |
- Last Updated on 4 May, 2025
Under the Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023 (DPDP Act), a data privacy breach, referred to as a "personal data breach," is defined as any unauthorised processing of personal data or accidental disclosure, acquisition, sharing, use, alteration, destruction, or loss of access to personal data that compromises its confidentiality, integrity, or availability. This includes incidents such as cyberattacks, accidental data leaks, misconfigured databases, or insider misuse that expose, alter, or restrict access to personal data without lawful authority.
Table of Contents
- What Constitutes a “Personal Data Breach”?
- Mandatory Personal Data Breach Notification – Section 8(6)
- Data Protection Board of India – Powers
- Penalty Grid (Schedule)
- Voluntary Undertaking (VU) – Section 32
- Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR)
- Case‑Study Simulation
- Criminal Liability
- Insurance & Mitigation
- Conclusion
Check out Taxmann's Digital Personal Data Protection Act 2023 with Draft Rules – Bare Act with Section Notes which offers a robust framework for India's data privacy landscape. It clarifies rights and safeguards for Data Principals, details obligations for Data Fiduciaries, and highlights recent legislative updates from statutes like the IT Act and RTI Act. Comprehensive Section Notes and FAQs delve into key principles such as consent and cross-border transfers, simplifying complex provisions for easy reference. The book's structured approach, with illustrations, indexes, and a clear layout, caters to legal practitioners, corporate counsels, regulators, students, and IT professionals.
1. What Constitutes a “Personal Data Breach”?
Section 2 (u) –
“…any unauthorised processing of personal data or accidental disclosure, acquisition, sharing, use, alteration, destruction or loss of access to personal data that compromises confidentiality, integrity or availability of personal data.”
Examples –
- Ransomware encrypts the payroll server → loss of availability.
- Misconfigured S3 bucket exposes KYC PDFs → disclosure.
- Insider copies customer list to personal drive → unauthorised acquisition.
2. Mandatory Personal Data Breach Notification – Section 8(6)
Element | Requirement | Draft Rule Expectation* |
Notify DPB | “As soon as practicable” | Email + online form within 72 hrs; include root‑cause & containment. |
Notify Affected Data Principals | In form and manner as may be prescribed. | Direct email/SMS for high‑risk breaches; public notice if contacts are unavailable. |
Form & Manner | To be prescribed | JSON schema + incident‑report template. |
*MEITY consultation draft, Jan 2025.
Tip – Maintain a 24×7 incident‑response team with the authority to file notifications without a board bottleneck.
3. Data Protection Board of India – Powers
Power | Statutory Basis | Practical Effect |
Inquiry | Issue notice, demand documents, summon officers. | |
Civil‑court powers | Sec 28(7) | Compel attendance, discovery, examination under oath. |
Search & seizure | Seize servers, drives. | |
Monetary penalties | Schedule | Impose up to ₹250 crore per breach. |
Voluntary Undertaking | Sec 32 | Accept the corrective plan; suspend the inquiry unless the undertaking breached. |
Power of Central Government to issue directions – to block for access by the public any information | Sec 37 | Advise the Govt to block offending platform in extreme repetitive breach. |
As per sec 29(2), Board’s orders appeal to TDSAT within 60 days; then further appeal to the Supreme Court.
4. Penalty Grid (Schedule)
Violation | Maximum Fine (₹) |
No “reasonable security safeguards” → breach | 250 crore |
Breach, but no timely notification | 200 crore |
Children’s provisions violated | 200 crore |
SDF additional duties flouted | 150 crore |
Any other DPDP breach | 50 crore |
Frivolous complaint by an individual | 10, 000 |
While determining the amount of monetary penalty, the DPB must consider the following factors namely –
- The nature, gravity and duration of breach
- The type and nature of personal data affected by breach
- Repetitive nature of breach
- Whether the person has realised a gain or avoided anyloss, as a result of breach
- Whether the person took any action to mitigate the effects and consequences of breach
- Whether monetary penalty to be imposed is proportionate and effective
5. Voluntary Undertaking (VU) – Section 32
- Fiduciary under inquiry can proffer a VU (e.g., upgrade encryption, hire CISO, undergo audit).
- DPB may accept; inquiry is paused.
- Breach of VU = fresh proceeding + penalties attached to the original violation.
VU is beneficial where fault is admitted and speedy remediation is achievable.
6. Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR)
DPB may refer certain disputes to mediation (Sec 34) – expect use for low‑value grievances or first‑time offences, reducing litigation load. Mediated settlement is binding but still reportable in the compliance history.
7. Case‑Study Simulation
Scenario – FinTech ABC loses 1 million Aadhaar scans via a compromised API.
Timeline –
- T + 0h – SOC detects exfiltration.
- T + 6h – ABC triggers IRP, disables API, and quantifies scope.
- T + 30h – Notifies DPB + users, offers 12‑month credit monitoring.
- DPB opens inquiry, sees prompt actions; ABC submits VU (third‑party audit + bug bounty).
- DPB accepts VU; imposes a token ₹5 crore fine for lapse, contingent on audit completion.
Prompt breach handling sliced potential exposure (₹250 crore) down to a manageable level.
8. Criminal Liability
The DPDP Act does not impose imprisonment. However, separate penal statutes (such as the IPC, IT Act Sec 66) may still apply to malicious insiders or hackers.
9. Insurance & Mitigation
- Cyber‑risk policies in India now expressly include DPDP fines (insurable as “civil penalty”, subject to public‑policy exceptions).
- Insurers demand – ISO 27001 certification, tabletop breach drills, vendor‑assessment program.
10. Conclusion
Robust preventative security remains first defence, but when incidents occur, speed, transparency and cooperation with DPB greatly mitigate financial and reputational fallout.
Dive Deeper:
Overview of Digital Personal Data Protection Act (DPDP Act) 2023
Scope and Key Definitions Under DPDP Act
Rights of Data Principals under the DPDP Act 2023
Lawful Processing and Consent under DPDP Act 2023
Cross‑Border Data Transfers under the DPDP Act 2023
Obligations of Data Fiduciaries under DPDP Act 2023
DPDP Act Compliance Checklist for Businesses
DPDP Act vs IT Act – Shifting India’s Data‑protection Paradigm
DPDP Act vs EU GDPR Compliance – A Comparative Analysis
DPDP Act Impact on Startups and SMEs in India
FinTech and BFSI – Sector-specific Guidance for DPDP Compliance
DPDP in Healthcare Ecosystem – HealthTech and Hospitals
Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.

Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.
The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:
- The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
- All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
- Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
- Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
- All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
- The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
- Font and size that’s easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied