Transactions Involving Part Payment Before Completion Certificate Would Amount to Works Contract and Attract GST | HC
- News|Blog|GST & Customs|
- 2 Min Read
- By Taxmann
- |
- Last Updated on 22 April, 2025
Case Details: B.G. Parameshwara vs. Bengaluru Development Authority - [2025] 173 taxmann.com 290 (Karnataka)
Judiciary and Counsel Details
- M.G.S. Kamal, J.
-
Monesh Kumar & Raghavendra G. Gayatri, Advs. for the Petitioner.
-
Basavaraja H.T., Akash B. Shetty, Advs. & Smt. B. Sukanya Baliga, AGA for the Respondent.
Facts of the Case
The petitioner, a real estate developer, challenged the levy of Goods and Services Tax (GST) on property transactions, claiming the properties were fully constructed and not subject to GST. The department, however, contended that the agreements for the purchase of apartments and row houses were entered into during the construction period, with part payments made before the completion certificate was issued. They argued that, under Section 7 read with Schedule II of the CGST Act, such transactions qualified as works contracts, thereby attracting GST liability.
High Court Held
The Hon’ble High Court held that when a transaction is entered into before the completion of construction and consideration is paid partly or fully before the issuance of the completion certificate, it amounts to the supply of services attracting GST liability. The court observed that the payment schedules confirmed the petitioner had made partial payments during the construction period. It further noted that the relevant notification explicitly required GST to be paid separately by the allottees. The court found no element of discrimination, particularly since tax was not levied on properties that were completed before the implementation of GST. Accordingly, the writ petition was dismissed, and the GST liability on such transactions was upheld in favour of the department.
List of Cases Reviewed
- Larsen and Toubro Limited and Another v. State of Karnataka and Another [(2014) 1 SCC 708] – [Para 25] followed.
List of Cases Referred to
- Larsen and Toubro Limited and Another v. State of Karnataka and Another (2014) 1 SCC 708 (Para 5 and 13)
- M/s. Total Environment Buildings Systems Private Limited v. Deputy Commissioner of Commercial and Others Taxes (2022) 16 SCC 219 (Para 5)
Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.

Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.
The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:
- The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
- All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
- Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
- Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
- All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
- The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
- Font and size that’s easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied