Time-limit U/s 149(1)(B) is for Issuing Notice After Recording Reasons & Not for Furnishing Copy of Reasons to Assessee
- News|Blog|Income Tax|
- 2 Min Read
- By Taxmann
- |
- Last Updated on 12 April, 2024

Case Details: Bangalore Turf Club Ltd. v. Union of India - [2024] 161 taxmann.com 353 (Karnataka)
Judiciary and Counsel Details
- B.M. Shyam Prasad, J.
- S. Naganand, Sr. Counsel & Smt. Sumana Naganand, Adv. for the Petitioner.
- Raviraj Y.V., Adv. for the Respondent.
Facts of the Case
The Bangalore Turf Club Limited (the assessee), a recognized Turf Authority, was engaged in organizing thoroughbred horse racing. The assessee was assessed for the relevant assessment year under section 143(3).
During the assessment proceedings, payments made to horse owners were disallowed under section 40(a)(ia) on the ground that TDS under section 194B/194BB was not made. Aggrieved by the order, the assessee filed an appeal before the Tribunal. The Tribunal granted a stay of the assessment order.
Subsequently, the Assessing Officer (AO) issued a notice under section 148 to initiate reassessment proceedings. The assessee contended that the initiation of proceedings under section 147 was barred by limitation as the copy of the reasons recorded was issued after the expiry of six years from the end of the relevant assessment year.
The matter reached the Karnataka High Court.
High Court Held
The High Court held that the time limit prescribed under section 149(1)(b) is for issuing a notice under section 148 after recording reasons and not for furnishing a copy of the reasons to the assessee.
The conditions for the exercise of jurisdiction to initiate reassessment must be complied with within the time limit for issuing the notice. If the power vested to exercise such jurisdiction is shackled, it cannot be reasonably opined that reasons for reassessment had to be furnished within the period of six years.
In the instant case, reasons were recorded for re-assessment before issuance of notice, and the assessee had disclosed primary facts. Thus, there could not be any allegation of failure to truly and fully disclose material facts.
Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.

Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.
The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:
- The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
- All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
- Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
- Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
- All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
- The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
- Font and size that’s easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied

CA | CS | CMA