Section 43B Deduction Denied on Transferred Leave Encashment Liability | ITAT
- Blog|News|Income Tax|
- 3 Min Read
- By Taxmann
- |
- Last Updated on 16 February, 2026

Judiciary and Counsel Details
- Vijay Pal Rao, Vice President & Manjunatha G., Accountant Member
-
Dr Sachin Kumar, Sr. AR for the Appellant.
-
Rohit Mittal & Sandeep Bansal, CAs for the Respondent.
Facts of the Case
The assessee-company, engaged in providing administrative support services to ”Corteva Group”, pursuant to its business transfer agreement, transferred one of its business undertakings along with certain employees on a slump sale basis to ”P” and filed its return of income claiming deduction towards leave encashment and bonus payment under section 43B on the ground that the liability arising out of provisions made for the financial year 2018-19 had been paid on 1-4-2019, which was on or before the due date for filing the return of income under section 139(1).
The Assessing Officer (AO) disallowed the claim because the assessee had not proved the actual payment of said liabilities on or before the due date prescribed under section 139(1). The CIT(A) deleted the additions made by the AO towards the disallowance of liabilities under Section 43B. Aggrieved by the order, the AO filed an appeal before the Tribunal.
ITAT Held
The Tribunal held that there is no concept of deemed payment of liability referred to under section 43B for claiming a deduction towards said liability while computing the income from business or profession. A person cannot, by contract, transfer or shift his statutory obligations to another and claim a deduction under section 43B. In order to claim a deduction under Section 43B, there should be actual payment of liability as stipulated thereon, and such payment, if made on or before the due date for filing the return of income under Section 139(1) in terms of the proviso to Section 43B, is allowable as a deduction.
In the present case, the assessee transferred the liability related to leave encashment, bonus payment of employees to the transferee undertaking and claimed that, upon transfer of said liability, the liability payable to the employees has been discharged by invoking a deeming fiction even though there is no provision under the Act, including section 43B of the Act, for deeming payment.
Whether the transferee entity has paid the employees and claimed deduction towards the said liability while computing income from business or profession is not relevant to decide whether the assessee can claim deduction for the said liability under Section 43B of the Act. The assessee cannot claim a deduction towards the said liability under section 43B of the Act while computing income from business and profession.
List of Cases Reviewed
- Union of India v. Exide Industries Limited [2020] 116 taxmann.com 378 (SC)/[2020] 273 Taxman 189/[2020] 425 ITR 1 (SC)
- Pembril Engineering Private Limited v. DCIT [2015] 61 taxmann.com 222 (Mumbai)/[2015] 155 ITD 72 (Mumbai) (para 15) followed
- M.M. Aqua Technologies Ltd. v. CIT [2021] 129 taxmann.com 145 (SC)/[2021] 282 Taxman 281 (SC)/[2021] 436 ITR 582 (SC)
- Frontier Information Tech Limited v. DCIT [2024] 169 taxmann.com 729/[2025] 303 Taxman 378/[2024] 478 ITR 637 (TELANGANA) (para 18) distinguished
List of Cases Referred to
- Collector, Land Acquisition v. MST. Katiji [1987] 167 ITR 471 (SC) (para 5)
- CIT v. ISRO Satellite Centre [2013] 35 taxmann.com 352/263 CTR 549/218 Taxman 74 (Karnataka) (para 5)
- Srimaan Industries Private Limited Vs. ITO [2022] 217 TTJ (Hyd) 120 (para 5)
- W.T. Suren & Co. Ltd. v. CIT [1998] 97 Taxman 126 (SC)/[1998] 230 ITR 643 (SC) (para 10)
- J.R. Diamonds Ltd. v. Asstt. CIT [1999] 70 ITD 42 (Mumbai) (para 10)
- M.M. Aqua Technologies Ltd. v. CIT [2021] 129 taxmann.com 145 (SC)/[2021] 282 Taxman 281 (SC)/[2021] 436 ITR 582 (SC) (para 10)
- Frontier Information Tech Ltd. v. Dy. CIT [2024] 169 taxmann.com 729 (TELANGANA)/[2025] 303 Taxman 378 (TELANGANA)/[2024] 478 ITR 637 (TELANGANA) (para 10)
- Sree Akilandeswari Mills (P.) Ltd. v. Dy. CIT [2006] 200 CTR 315/[2005] 274 ITR 1/145 Taxman 474 (Madras) (para 10)
- Peter Vaz v. CIT Central Circle, Bangalore [2021] 128 taxmann.com 180 (Bombay)/[2021] 281 Taxman 171 (Bombay)/[2021] 436 ITR 616 (Bombay) (para 11)
- Incredible India Projects (P.). Ltd. v. CIT [IT Appeal Nos. 604 and 605 (Hyd) of 2022, dated 14-11-2024] (para 11)
- Itek Packz v. ITO [IT Appeal No. 995 (Bang) of 2022, dated 28-12-2022] (para 12)
- Kalpesh Synthetics (P.) Ltd. v. Dy. CIT [2022] 137 taxmann.com 475/195 ITD 142/96 ITR(T) 690 (Mumbai – Trib.) (para 12)
- Vikas Goyal v. DCIT [IT Appeal No. 501 (Bang) of 2025,dated 6-12-2025] (para 12)
- Sanjay Kumar Sharma v. ITO [2025] 174 taxmann.com 592 (Chhattisgarh) (para 12)
- CIT v. GVK Industries Ltd. [2023] 147 taxmann.com 281 (Telangana) (para 12)
- Union of India v. Exide Industries Ltd. [2020] 116 taxmann.com 378 (SC)/[2020] 273 Taxman 189 (SC)/[2020] 425 ITR 1 (SC) (para 14)
- Pembril Engineering (P.) Ltd. v. Dy. CIT [2015] 61 taxmann.com 222 (Mumbai)/[2015] 155 ITD 72 (Mumbai) (para 14).
Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.

Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.
The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:
- The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
- All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
- Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
- Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
- All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
- The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
- Font and size that’s easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied

CA | CS | CMA