Section 292B Couldn’t be Invoked to Cure a Mistake of Issuing Notice in Name of Different Entity | Delhi HC

  • Blog|News|Income Tax|
  • 2 Min Read
  • By Taxmann
  • |
  • Last Updated on 7 October, 2023

Sec. 292B

Case Details: AVS Infrabuild (P.) Ltd. V. Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax - [2023] 154 taxmann.com 429 (Delhi)

Judiciary and Counsel Details

  • Rajiv Shakdher & Girish Kathpalia, JJ.
  • Nischay Kantoor, Ms Sonia Dodeja & Ved Jain, Advs. for the Petitioner.
  • Sanjeev Menon, Standing Counsel, Zoheb Hossain, Sr Standing Counsel & Ajay Kumar Pandey, Adv. for the Respondent.

Facts of the Case

Assessing Officer (AO) passed an order under section 148A(d), and subsequently, the assessee received a notice under section 148, which was in the name of a different entity. In the meantime, the AO, by a letter intimated the assessee that the notice had been issued to it. He further passed a reassessment order on the assessee and issued a demand and penalty notice.

Assessee challenged the notice before the Delhi High Court.

Delhi High Court Held

The Delhi High Court held that the notice issued under section 148 had various errors, namely incorrect name and PAN of the assessee, wrong assessment year and document identification number, which shows that the notice issued under section 148 does not concern the assessee.

If these defects were excised, quite clearly, nothing would remain of the notice, and it would cease to be a notice bearing the imprint of section 148.

According to a straightforward interpretation of section 148, the Assessing Officer (AO) must, before conducting an assessment, reassessment, or re-computation under section 147, serve the assessee with a notice, along with a copy of the order issued if deemed necessary under clause (d) of section 148A.

Therefore, the reassessment proceedings can only commence once notice under section 148 is issued. It is a step AO must take before he assumes jurisdiction, inter alia, for reassessing the case.

Insofar as the reliance placed on section 292B was concerned, a mistake, which can be corrected under section 292B, should be such that if excised, it does not change the tenor and scope of the documents/proceedings referred to therein. Undoubtedly, there was a misstep on the part of AO since he has not assumed jurisdiction as per law.

Therefore, the impugned notice issued under section 148, the reassessment order, notices of demand and penalty, and the order issued under section 148A(d) deserve to be quashed.

List of Cases Reviewed

List of Cases Referred to

Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Everything on Tax and Corporate Laws of India

To subscribe to our weekly newsletter please log in/register on Taxmann.com

Author: Taxmann

Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.

The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:

  • The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
  • All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
  • Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
  • Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
  • All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
  • The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
  • Font and size that's easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied