Secondment Reimbursements Taxable as FTS | HC
- Blog|News|International Tax|
- 3 Min Read
- By Taxmann
- |
- Last Updated on 24 June, 2026

Case Details: Commissioner of Income-tax (International Taxation)-1 vs. Ernst and Young U.S. LLP [2026] 187 taxmann.com 711 (Delhi)
Judiciary and Counsel Details
- V. Kameswar Rao & Vinod Kumar, JJ.
- Puneet Rai, SSC, Ashvini Kr., Rishabh Nangia & Gibran, JSCs for the Appellant.
- S. Ganesh, Sr. Adv. & Ms Ananya Kapoor, Adv. for the Respondent.
Facts of the Case
The assessee was a US-based member of the EY network. It entered into secondment agreements with EY India entities, under which its personnel were deputed to work in India. The assessee received certain amounts towards cost-to-cost reimbursement of the salary of seconded employees. The assessee claimed that the said amount was not taxable in India as it was a cost-to-cost reimbursement. However, the Assessing Officer (AO) opined that the secondees continued to be employees of the US entity who made available technical knowledge and expertise to the Indian entities. Thus, he treated the reimbursements as Fees for Technical Services (FTS).
The matter reached the Delhi High Court.
High Court Held
The High Court held that the AO had thoroughly examined the scope of services rendered and found that the secondees were deputed to India to impart and implement the EY Group’s culture, processes, policies, and standards within the Indian entities. Once such processes and policies were absorbed, the Indian entities could independently apply them in the future. The Court held that the secondees had made available technical knowledge, skill, and experience to the Indian entities and, therefore, the ‘make available’ condition stood satisfied.
Further, the secondees never ceased to be employees of EY US. The Indian entities had no authority to terminate their employment and could only end the secondment arrangement, enabling the secondees to rejoin EY US. The deputation agreements preserved the employment lien of the secondees with EY US, which retained overarching control over them throughout the assignment.
Additionally, Indian entities had the right to undertake legal or disciplinary action against misconduct, fraud, willful negligence, or any illegal action by any international assignee, and to terminate secondment before the agreed period, thereby relieving them from Indian entities to enable them to join the assessor. Accordingly, the Court held that the secondment arrangement was like a deputation, through which the secondees made their technical expertise and know-how available to the Indian entities.
Consequently, the payments received by the assessee from EY India entities towards secondment of employees were taxable in India as FTS under section 9(1)(vii) and Article 12 of the India–USA DTAA, as the services satisfied the ‘make available’ condition under Article 12(4)(b) of the DTAA.
List of Cases Reviewed
-
CIT (International Taxation)-1 v. Bio-Rad Laboratories (Singapore) Pte. Ltd. [2023] 155 taxmann.com 646 (Delhi)/[2024] 296 Taxman 167 (Delhi)/[2023] 459 ITR 5 (Delhi) (para 59)
-
CIT, International Taxation v. RELX Inc [2024] 160 taxmann.com 109 (Delhi) (para 60)
-
Aecom Technical Services Inc. v. ITO, IT [2025] 174 taxmann.com 1173 (Delhi)/[2025] 305 Taxman 234 (Delhi)/[2026] 485 ITR 357 (Delhi) (para 61)
-
Pr. CIT v. Boeing India (P.) Ltd. [2023] 146 taxmann.com 131 (Delhi)/[2023] 457 ITR 84 (Delhi) (para 73)
-
AT & T Communication Services (India) (P.) Ltd. v. Dy. CIT [2019] 101 taxmann.com 105 (Delhi-Trib.) (para 74)
-
CIT v. Industrial Engineering Projects (P.) Ltd. [1993] 202 ITR 1014 (Delhi) (para 75)
-
K. Ravindranathan Nair v. CIT [2001] 114 Taxman 53 (SC) /[2001] 247 ITR 178 (SC (para 88)
-
Centrica India Offshore (P.) Ltd. v. CIT-I [2014] 51 taxmann.com 386 (SC)/[2014] 227 Taxman 368 (SC) (para 68)
-
Ernst & Young U.S. LLP v. ACIT [2025] 177 taxmann.com 170 (Delhi-Trib.),
-
Ernst & Young U.S. LLP v. ACIT [Order of ITAT, ITA No.2332/Del/2022, order dated 27-7-2022], Ernst and Young U.S. LLP vs. ACIT [2025] 175 taxmann.com 150 (Delhi-Trib.)
-
Order of ITAT in IT Appeal No.. 3253/Del/2023, dated 19-09-2023, Order of ITAT in IT Appeal No.. 1243/Del/2025, dated 12-12-2024 (para 89)
List of Cases Referred to
- Centrica India Offshore (P.) Ltd. v. CIT-I [2014] 51 taxmann.com 386 (SC)/[2014] 227 Taxman 368 (SC) (para 20)
- Pr. CIT v. Boeing India (P.) Ltd. [2023] 146 taxmann.com 131 (Delhi)/[2023] 457 ITR 84 (Delhi) (para 30)
- AT & T Communication Services (India) (P.) Ltd. v. Dy. CIT [2019] 101 taxmann.com 105 (Delhi – Trib.) (para 30)
- DIT (IT)-I v. A.P. Moller Maersk AS [2017] 78 taxmann.com 287 (SC)/[2017] 246 Taxman 309 (SC)/[2017] 392 ITR 186 (SC) (para 30)
- CIT v. Industrial Engineering Projects (P.) Ltd. [1993] 202 ITR 1014 (Delhi) (para 30)
- K. Ravindranathan Nair v. CIT [2001] 114 Taxman 53 (SC)/[2001] 247 ITR 178 (SC) (para 31)
- CIT (International Taxation)-1 v. Bio-Rad Laboratories (Singapore) Pte. Ltd. [2023] 155 taxmann.com 646 (Delhi)/[2024] 296 Taxman 167 (Delhi)/[2023] 459 ITR 5 (Delhi) (para 38)
- CIT, International Taxation v. RELX Inc [2024] 160 taxmann.com 109 (Delhi) (para 38)
- Aecom Technical Services Inc. v. ITO, IT [2025] 174 taxmann.com 1173 (Delhi)/[2025] 305 Taxman 234 (Delhi)/[2026] 485 ITR 357 (Delhi) (para 38)
- CIT v. De Beers India Minerals (P.) Ltd. [2012] 21 taxmann.com 214 (Karnataka)/[2012] 208 Taxman 406 (Karnataka)/[2012] 346 ITR 467 (Karnataka) (para 55)
Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.

Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.
The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:
- The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
- All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
- Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
- Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
- All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
- The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
- Font and size that’s easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied

CA | CS | CMA