SC nullifies order for special audit u/s 142(2A) as order approving audit wasn’t communicated to assessee
- Blog|Income Tax|News|
- 61 Views
- 2 Min Read
- By Taxmann
- Last Updated on 23 January, 2023
Case Details: Rajiv Gandhi Proudyogiki Vishwavidyalaya v. Union of India -  146 taxmann.com 353 (SC)
Judiciary and Counsel Details
- Sanjiv Khanna & M.M. Sundresh, JJ.
- Sumit Nema, Sr. Adv. Piyush Parashar, Gagan Tiwari, Chanakya Sharma & Ms Chetna Bhargava, Advs. Harsh Parashar, AOR for the Appellant.
- Arijit Prasad, Sr. Adv. Balbir Singh, ASG Rajan Kumar Choursia, Mrs Alka Agarwal, Ms Monica Benjamin, Advs. & Raj Bahadur Yadav, AOR for the Respondent.
Facts of the Case
Petitioner-University set up by the state of Madhya Pradesh, was served a show-cause notice under section 142(2A) for initiating a special audit. In response, objections raised by the petitioner were submitted to the revenue. Considering such reasons and explanations, an order confirming the special audit was passed but never served to the petitioner.
A writ petition to the Madhya Pradesh High Court was filed but all in vain. Aggrieved by the order, a petition was filed to the Supreme Court of India.
Supreme Court Held
The Apex Court held that the order under section 142(2A) was neither communicated to the petitioner nor uploaded on the portal. The written order was only placed in the order sheet file of the revenue.
The order needs to be communicated so that the petitioner gets to know the reasons for such an audit. This non-communication violates the fundamental option of the petitioner to challenge the order with higher authorities since the petitioner does not have possession of the order.
Therefore, the department was directed to issue a fresh notice or earlier issued notice which needs to be communicated to the petitioner and accordingly passed the ruling in the assessee’s favor.
Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.
Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.
The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:
- The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
- All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
- Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
- Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
- All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
- The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
- Font and size that’s easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied