SAT Upholds SEBI’s Order Restraining MD and CEO of ZEEL from Holding a Directorial Position for Siphoning off Funds

  • News|Blog|Company Law|
  • 2 Min Read
  • By Taxmann
  • |
  • Last Updated on 12 July, 2023

Holding a Directorial Position for Siphoning off Funds

Case Details: Punit Goenka v. Securities and Exchange Board of India - [2023] 152 taxmann.com 205 (SAT-Mumbai)

Judiciary and Counsel Details

    • Tarun Agarwala, Presiding Officer & Ms Meera Swarup, Technical Member
    • Janak DwarkadasPesi Modi, Sr. Advs. Kunal KatariyaNitesh JainMs Shruti RajanAnubhav GhoshVivek ShahMs Vatsala KumarHarishankar RaghunathZerrick DasturMs Smriti SinghKushil ShahJitendr MotwaniManendra Singh, Advs. for the Appellant.
    • Darius Khambata, Sr. Adv. Aditya MehtaVidhi ShahJayesh AsharMihir ModyArnav MisaraHarshvardhan Melanta, Advs. for the Respondent.

Facts of the Case

In the instant case, the appellant was the Managing Director and Chief Executive Officer of ZEEL since 1-1-2010. Subhash Chandra was the Chairman of ZEEL at that time. In November 2019, two independent directors of ZEEL resigned after raising concerns over several issues, one of which was the appropriation of a fixed deposit of Rs. 200 crore of ZEEL by Yes Bank Ltd. to square off loans of related parties.

The SEBI conducted an examination to investigate the events that led to the resignation of independent directors. The examination revealed that Subhash Chandra issued a ‘Letter of Comfort’ to Yes Bank Ltd. regarding credit facilities availed by certain related entities of ZEEL.

The investigation, further revealed that the issuance of a ‘Letter of Comfort’ without informing the Board of Directors and without taking its approval was violative of the LODR Regulations. As a result, a show cause notice was issued.

SEBI further examined the matter concerning ZEEL’s claim of receiving funds from related entities. Thereafter, the impugned ex parte ad interim order was passed, directing the appellants that they would cease to hold any position of a director or a Key Managerial Personnel in any listed company or its subsidiaries till further orders.

On appeal, it was found that there was evidence, based on bank statements that prima facie indicated that there had been siphoning of funds and round tripping of funds from ZEEL to ZEE through related entities. Further, there was nothing on record to indicate that details of repayment made by related entities were made known by the appellants to the SEBI or the Stock Exchange in 2019-20.

SAT Held

The SAT held that there were no instances of perversity, irregularity, illegality or irrationality in the impugned order that barred the appellants from holding any position of a director or a Key Managerial Personnel in any listed company or its subsidiaries. Therefore, the SAT concluded that there were no grounds to interfere with the impugned order. Accordingly, the appeal was to be dismissed.

Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Everything on Tax and Corporate Laws of India

To subscribe to our weekly newsletter please log in/register on Taxmann.com

Author: Taxmann

Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.

The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:

  • The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
  • All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
  • Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
  • Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
  • All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
  • The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
  • Font and size that's easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied