SAT Reduces Penalty From Rs 25 to 10 Lakh where LODR Violations Were Not of Much Serious Nature

  • Blog|News|Company Law|
  • 2 Min Read
  • By Taxmann
  • |
  • Last Updated on 17 August, 2023

LODR Violations

Case Details: SecureKloud Technologies Ltd. v. Securities and Exchange Board of India - [2023] 152 taxmann.com 538 (SAT-Mumbai)

Judiciary and Counsel Details

    • Justice Tarun Agarwala, Presiding Officer & Ms Meera Swarup, Technical Member
    • Ms Shruti Rajan, Adv., Anubhav GhoshVivek Shah, Advs. for the Appellant.
    • Pradeep Sancheti, Sr. Adv., Mihir ModyArnav MisraHarshvardhan Melanta, Advs. for the Respondent.

Facts of the Case

In the instant case, an investigation into the affairs of the appellant (i.e. the company) had revealed that the appellant was not following the due process of approving related party transactions.

It was also alleged that there was non-disclosure of a forensic audit being initiated against the appellant, which constituted a material event under regulation 30 of LODR regulations requiring disclosure. However, the company and company secretary failed to do so.

SEBI, after considering the replies and material evidence on record, found the appellant guilty of the said charges and consequently, imposed a penalty of Rs. 25 lakh under section 23E of the Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act, 1956 on the appellant.

It was noted that the appellant had committed violations of various provisions of LODR regulations. The said violations were, however, not that serious warranting the imposition of high penalties. Further, the appellant had been penalized under section 23E of the Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act, 1956.

It was noted that in the case of Suzlon Energy Ltd. v. SEBI [2021] 127 taxmann.com 333, it was held that section 23E is not a charging provision for the imposition of penalty for violation of the Listing Agreement. Instead, the correct provision is section 23A(a) of the SCRA and the penalty u/s 23A of SCRA ranges from a minimum of Rs. 1 lakh to a maximum of Rs. 1 crore.

SAT Held

The SAT held that, considering the aforesaid and violations committed by the appellant, the imposition of a penalty amounting to Rs. 25 lakh was excessive and arbitrary given in the facts and circumstances of the given case. Thus, the penalty of Rs. 25 lakhs was to be reduced to Rs. 10 lakh.

List of Cases Reviewed

List of Cases Referred to

Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Everything on Tax and Corporate Laws of India

To subscribe to our weekly newsletter please log in/register on Taxmann.com

Author: Taxmann

Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.

The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:

  • The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
  • All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
  • Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
  • Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
  • All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
  • The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
  • Font and size that's easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied