AA Rightly Reduced the Fine as Appellant Admitted Default & Approached AA for Compounding of Offence u/s 96 | NCLAT

  • Blog|News|Company Law|
  • 2 Min Read
  • By Taxmann
  • |
  • Last Updated on 17 August, 2023

Compounding of Offence u/s 96

Case Details: Salil Gulati v. Registrar of Companies, NCT of Delhi and Haryana - [2023] 152 taxmann.com 477 (NCLAT-New Delhi)

Judiciary and Counsel Details

    • Rakesh Kumar, Judicial Member & Dr Alok Srivastava, Technical Member
    • Shailendra Singh SomvanshiMunawwar Nasim, Advs. for the Appellant.
    • Ms Shankari MishraMs Niharika Tanwar, Advs. & Vedant Ojha, Dy. ROC for the Respondent.

Facts of the Case

In the instant case, the appellant (i.e. director) along with the company and five others were held guilty for non-compliance with section 96 of the Companies Act, 2013 in the holding of the Annual General Meeting (AGM).

Subsequently, a joint application was filed before the Adjudicating Authority (NCLT) under section 441 for the compounding of the offence. The NCLT called for a report from the ROC in respect of default by all the applicants.

The NCLT passed an order, wherein after compounding the offences, a fine amounting to the extent of 1/5th of the maximum fine was imposed. The appellant filed an instant appeal before the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) against the order passed by the NCLT.

It was submitted that the NCLT had committed an error in imposing an excessive fine which required to be interfered with. Further, it was noted that as per the report of ROC, the maximum fine to be imposed on the appellant was to the extent of Rs. 1.32 crores. However, the NCLT reduced it to 1/5th of the maximum.

Further, NCLT had taken the same stand of reducing the fine in respect of the other applicants.

NCLAT Held

The NCLAT held that since the appellant had admitted his default and approached the NCLT for compounding of offence and the NCLT had reduced the fine, the instant tribunal did not find any error warranting interference. Accordingly, the appeal was to be dismissed.

List of Cases Reviewed

List of Cases Referred to

Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Everything on Tax and Corporate Laws of India

To subscribe to our weekly newsletter please log in/register on Taxmann.com

Author: Taxmann

Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.

The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:

  • The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
  • All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
  • Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
  • Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
  • All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
  • The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
  • Font and size that's easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied