Same GST Rate Must Apply to All Buyers in Project | AAR
- Blog|News|GST & Customs|
- 2 Min Read
- By Taxmann
- |
- Last Updated on 8 July, 2025

Case Details: Godrej Residency (P.) Ltd., In re - [2025] 174 taxmann.com 1169 (AAR-MAHARASHTRA)
Judiciary and Counsel Details
- D.P. Gojamgunde & Ms Priya Jadhav, Member
Facts of the Case
The Applicant took over an under-construction residential project from an erstwhile promoter who had commenced development of the project comprising two residential buildings. The erstwhile promoter had exercised the one-time option under Notification No. 3/2019-Central Tax (Rate), dated 29-03-2019, opting to pay GST at the standard rate with input tax credit in accordance with Sl. No. 3(if) of Notification No. 11/2017-Central Tax (Rate), dated 28-06-2017, read with the mechanism for 1/3rd deduction towards land value. The jurisdictional officer under CGST contended that the Applicant was bound by the option exercised by the erstwhile promoter and must pay GST at the effective rate of 12% (post land abatement) with input tax credit on all consideration received for residential premises, whether sold by the erstwhile promoter or by the Applicant to new buyers. The Applicant submitted that separate GST rates should apply—12% for balance consideration from earlier allottees and 5% (without ITC) for new buyers. The matter was accordingly placed before the Authority for Advance Ruling (AAR), Maharashtra.
AAR Held
The Authority for Advance Ruling (AAR), Maharashtra held that the one-time option exercised under Notification No. 3/2019-Central Tax (Rate), dated 29-03-2019 was qua-project and continued to bind the Applicant. It ruled that the Applicant could not adopt two different rates of tax for the same project—12% for existing buyers and 5% for new buyers—and was mandatorily required to discharge GST at the effective rate of 12% with input tax credit for consideration received from both categories of buyers. The AAR clarified that the project-wise option once exercised under the notification attaches to the entire project regardless of change in promoter, and that the Applicant’s non-availment of unutilized input tax credit from the erstwhile promoter does not affect this liability.
List of Cases Referred to
- Victoria Realtors, In re [2021] 129 taxmann.com 188/87 GST 172/ 53 GSTL 314 (AAR-KERALA) (para 2.5.1).
Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.

Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.
The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:
- The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
- All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
- Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
- Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
- All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
- The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
- Font and size that’s easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied

CA | CS | CMA