Plea Seeking Copy of Resolution Plan Was Rightly Rejected As Applicant Was Neither a Claimant Nor a Creditor of CD | NCLAT

  • Blog|News|Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code|
  • 2 Min Read
  • By Taxmann
  • |
  • Last Updated on 2 September, 2023

Resolution Plan

Case Details: Rupinder Singh Gill v. Three C Universal Developers (P.) Ltd. - [2023] 153 taxmann.com 216 (NCLAT-New Delhi)

Judiciary and Counsel Details

    • Rakesh Kumar Jain, Judicial Member & Dr Alok Srivastava, Technical Member
    • Krishnendu Datta, Sr. Adv., Ms Prachi JohriRahul Gupta, Advs. for the Appellant.
    • Abhishek AnandMohak SharmaVaibhav M., Advs. for the Respondent.

Facts of the Case

In the instant case, the appellant entered into an agreement with the corporate debtor to purchase shareholdings of the corporate debtor. The corporate debtor initiated proceedings of oppression and mismanagement against the appellant, wherein, the Adjudicating Authority (NCLT) passed an interim order granting status quo on the said shareholdings.

Subsequently, the corporate debtor went into insolvency and its Resolution Professional (RP) filed an application seeking approval of a resolution plan before the NCLT.

During the pendency of the approval of the said plan by the NCLT, the appellant filed an application for intervention and requested a copy of the resolution plan. However, this application was declined vide the impugned order on the ground that the appellant had not submitted any claim before the RP and, thus, had no locus standi.

The appellant filed an instant appeal against the said order, arguing that he had an interest in the shareholdings of the corporate debtor by virtue of the agreement and, hence, he was entitled to a copy of the resolution plan.

NCLAT Held

The NCLAT held that a copy of the resolution plan, which was still in the process of approval or rejection by the NCLT could not be given to a party who was neither a claimant nor a creditor. Therefore, there was no error on the part of the NCLT in rejecting the appellant’s application. Accordingly, the appeal was to be dismissed.

List of Cases Reviewed

List of Cases Referred to

Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Everything on Tax and Corporate Laws of India

To subscribe to our weekly newsletter please log in/register on Taxmann.com

Author: Taxmann

Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.

The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:

  • The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
  • All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
  • Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
  • Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
  • All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
  • The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
  • Font and size that's easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied