Pendency of Review Petition Before Apex Court Can’t Be a Ground to Interfere Order Passed by Lower Authority | HC

  • News|Blog|Income Tax|
  • 2 Min Read
  • By Taxmann
  • |
  • Last Updated on 17 December, 2023

pendency of review petition

Case Details: Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax (Benami Prohibition) v. Advance Infra Developers (P.) Ltd. - [2023] 157 taxmann.com 307 (Madras)

Judiciary and Counsel Details

    • R. Mahadevan & Mohammed Shaffiq, JJ.
    • Mrs M. Sheela, Special Public Prosecutor for the Appellant.
    • R. Sivaraman for the Respondent.

Facts of the Case

The revenue filed the instant appeal against the order passed by the Tribunal. Revenue contended that Section 5 of the Prohibition of Benami Property Transactions Act, 1988, as amended by the Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Amendment Act, 2016 (2016 Act), will have retrospective effect.

The Tribunal passed an order relying upon the decision of the Supreme Court in the case of Union of India vs. Ganapati Dealcom P Ltd [2022] 141 taxmann.com 389 (SC). Against such decision, the Department already preferred a Review Petition in Diary No. 34619 of 2022 (Review Petition No. (Civil) 359 of 2023), and it is pending adjudication.

Thus, revenue submitted that the order passed by the Tribunal is contrary and liable to be interfered with.

High Court Held

The Madras High Court held that the Supreme Court, in the case of Ganapati Dealcom (Supra), held that the provisions under section 5 of the 2016 Act, being punitive in nature, can only be applied prospectively and not retrospectively.

In the Review Petition (Civil) Diary No. 34619 of 2022, the Department sought to review the Supreme Court’s order in Union of India vs. Ganapati Dealcom Pvt Ltd. Though the oral hearing was permitted by the order dated 25.01.2023, no stay order was issued by the Apex Court.

Thus, as of date, the decision of the Supreme Court in Ganapati Dealcom Pvt Ltd (Supra) holds the field. The argument that provisions of Section 5 of the Amended Act 2016 have to be applied retrospectively cannot be allowed.

The pending review of the Union of India vs. Ganapati Dealcom Pvt. Ltd. decision does not justify interference with the Tribunal’s order. It is also well settled that mere pendency of the Review Petition will not be a ground to assail the orders impugned in the appeals.

However, the revenue is open to proceed depending on the outcome of the review petition.

Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Everything on Tax and Corporate Laws of India

To subscribe to our weekly newsletter please log in/register on Taxmann.com

Author: Taxmann

Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.

The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:

  • The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
  • All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
  • Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
  • Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
  • All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
  • The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
  • Font and size that's easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied