Penalty to Be Imposed Only in Cases of Intentional Tax Evasion, Not on Inadvertent Errors | Allahabad HC
- Blog|News|GST & Customs|
- 2 Min Read
- By Taxmann
- |
- Last Updated on 1 April, 2024

Case Detail: Indeutsch Industries (P.) Ltd. v. State of U.P - [2024] 160 taxmann.com 733 (Allahabad)
Judiciary and Counsel Details
- Shekhar B. Saraf, J.
- Nishant Mishra for the Petitioner.
- C.S.C. for the Respondent.
Facts of the Case
The petitioner was engaged in manufacturing artist brush and its materials. It sold goods to its customer and engaged a transporter for transportation of goods. Due to unavailability of initially designated vehicle, the transporter utilized alternative vehicle for transportation which resulted in discrepancy in e-way bill generated.
The goods were detained by the department and penalty was levied under Section 129(3). It filed appeal against the detention of goods but the appeal was rejected. Thereafter, it filed writ petition against the order of detention.
High Court Held
The Honorable High Court noted that the goods were intercepted shortly after leaving SEZ unit and customs duty and IGST had been duly paid. The Court further noted that the intention to evade tax is sine qua non before imposition of penalty and the burden of proof lies on the petitioner to show no tax evasion.
However, in the present case, the Revenue failed to establish any such intention since discrepancy in e-way bill was merely a typographical error and there was no other evidence to establish tax evasion. Therefore, it was held that the penalty levied on the petitioner would be against the principles of natural justice and the impugned order was liable to be quashed and set aside.
Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.

Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.
The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:
- The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
- All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
- Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
- Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
- All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
- The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
- Font and size that’s easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied

CA | CS | CMA