Penalty For Goods Detention Over PIN Code Error Unjustified | HC

  • Blog|News|GST & Customs|
  • 2 Min Read
  • By Taxmann
  • |
  • Last Updated on 6 December, 2025

Global Financial Insights

Case Details: Ashok Kumar Maganbhai Patel vs. State of UP - [2025] 181 taxmann.com 89 (Allahabad)

Judiciary and Counsel Details

  • Piyush Agrawal, J.
  • Atul Gupta for the Petitioner.
  • R.S. Pandey, ACSC for the Respondent.

Facts of the Case

The petitioner challenged the seizure of goods and imposition of penalty arising from detention during transit, where the consignment was moving from Gujarat to West Bengal in a bill-to-ship-to transaction. The record showed that the goods were accompanied by a tax invoice, e-way bill, and railway receipt, and that the only discrepancy was a one-digit error in the ship-to PIN code on the tax invoice while the full address was otherwise correct. The petitioner contended that clause 5(b) of Circular No. 64/38/2018-GST, dated 14-09-2018 clarified that proceedings under section 129 of the CGST Act may not be initiated where the PIN code is incorrect but the consignor or consignee address is correct, and submitted that the statutory appeal was dismissed without considering the binding nature of circulars issued under section 168 of the CGST Act. The matter was accordingly placed before the High Court.

High Court Held

The High Court held that the detention of goods and imposition of penalty under section 129 was unjustified since the only discrepancy was a one-digit PIN code error and all other prescribed documents were in order. The Court noted that clause 5(b) of Circular No. 64/38/2018-GST, dated 14-09-2018 clearly stated that such an error does not warrant initiation of proceedings under section 129 when the address of the consignor or consignee is otherwise correct, and emphasised that circulars issued under section 168 are binding on field formations. The Court observed that the record disclosed no intent to evade tax and no other irregularity in the documentation, making the seizure and penalty contrary to statute and the governing circular. The High Court accordingly set aside the impugned orders and allowed the writ petition.

List of Cases Reviewed

List of Cases Referred to

Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.

Taxmann editorial team

Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.

The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:

  • The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
  • All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
  • Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
  • Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
  • All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
  • The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
  • Font and size that’s easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Everything on Tax and Corporate Laws of India

To subscribe to our weekly newsletter please log in/register on Taxmann.com

Author: Taxmann

Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.

The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:

  • The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
  • All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
  • Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
  • Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
  • All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
  • The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
  • Font and size that's easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied