Past Service Cost Under New Labour Codes | Ind AS 19 and 34 Explained
- Blog|News|Account & Audit|
- 3 Min Read
- By Taxmann
- |
- Last Updated on 31 December, 2025

1. Facts
Domato Limited hereinafter referred to as “the company, is engaged in the business of restaurants. The company prepares its financial statements in accordance with Ind AS and provides quarterly interim financial results under Ind AS 34. The Company employs a large workforce that is eligible for defined benefit gratuity and long-term leave encashment plans, both of which are actuarially valued in accordance with Ind AS 19.
During the financial year 2025–26, the New Labour Codes became effective from 21st November 2025. Under the said code, there is change in the definition of wages and eligibility criteria for benefits such as gratuity and leave encashment. Due to such change itis expected that it would increase employee related liabilities for many entities. Given the effective date of the codes and the absence of detailed Rules, entities are required to carefully assess the timing of recognition, measurement and presentation of the additional obligations. Although the Rules under the Codes are yet to be notified, legal advice obtained by the company indicates that the revised definition of wages and the expanded employee coverage for gratuity are immediately applicable for employees whose last working day falls on or after 21st November 2025. Consequently, the actuarial valuation as at 31st December 2025 reflects a significant increase in the gratuity and leave encashment obligations due to inclusion of additional wage components and higher base salaries for benefit computation.
In this context, the management of the company is in dilemma regarding the appropriate accounting treatment of the increased obligation. Further, the management wants to understand whether the increase in gratuity liability arising from the “New Labour Codes” should be treated as a change in actuarial assumptions, resulting in actuarial losses recognised in other comprehensive income, or as a plan amendment triggered by legislative changes, giving rise to past service cost that should be recognised immediately in the statement of profit and loss.
Further, the management wants to understand whether the additional employee benefit obligation should be recognised in the interim financial results for the quarter ended 31st December 2025 or whether recognition can be deferred until the annual financial statements for the year ending 31stMarch 2026, notwithstanding the absence of notified Rules.
2. Relevant Provisions
Ind AS 19 – Employee Benefits
Para 8 of Ind AS 19
Service cost comprises:
(a) current service cost, which is the increase in the present value of the defined benefit obligation resulting from employee service in the current period;
(b) past service cost, which is the change in the present value of the defined benefit obligation for employee service in prior periods, resulting from a plan amendment (the introduction or withdrawal of, or changes to, a defined benefit plan) or a curtailment (a significant reduction by the entity in the number of employees covered by a plan); and
(c) any gain or loss on settlement.
Para 102 of Ind AS 19
Past service cost is the change in the present value of the defined benefit obligation resulting from a plan amendment or curtailment.
Para 103 of Ind AS 19
An entity shall recognise past service cost as an expense at the earlier of the following dates:
(a) when the plan amendment or curtailment occurs; and
(b) when the entity recognises related restructuring costs or termination benefits
Ind AS 34 – Interim Financial Reporting
Para 28 of Ind AS 34
An entity shall apply the same accounting policies in its interim financial statements as are applied in its annual financial statements, except for accounting policy changes made after the date of the most recent annual financial statements that are to be reflected in the next annual financial statements. However, the frequency of an entity’s reporting (annual, half-yearly, or quarterly) shall not affect the measurement of its annual results. To achieve that objective, measurements for interim reporting purposes shall be made on a year-to-date basis.
Click Here To Read The Full Story
Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.

Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.
The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:
- The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
- All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
- Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
- Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
- All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
- The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
- Font and size that’s easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied

CA | CS | CMA