Orders require a hearing even if a reply mistakenly stated that hearing was not required: HC
- News|Blog|GST & Customs|
- 2 Min Read
- By Taxmann
- |
- Last Updated on 17 February, 2023
Case Details: Hitech Sweet Water Technologies (P.) Ltd. v. State of Gujarat - [2023] 147 taxmann.com 243 (Gujarat)
Judiciary and Counsel Details
-
- N.V. Anjaria & Bhargav D. Karia, JJ.
- Karankumar J. Sukawala & Mukund Kumar Chouhan for the Petitioner.
Facts of the Case
The petitioner was a manufacturer of water filter machines. It received three show-cause notices for the years 2017-18, 2018- 19 and 2019-20. The department passed assessment orders against the petitioner with respect of three years and the petitioner challenged the notices on the ground that the orders came to be passed in gross violation of principles of natural justice as opportunity of hearing was not granted.
High Court Held
The Honorable High Court noted that as per Section 75 of CGST Act, 2017, an opportunity of hearing shall be granted where a request is received in writing from the person chargeable with tax or penalty, or where any adverse decision is contemplated against such person. The Court also noted that the petitioner, in response to show-cause notice, indicated that he did not opt for personal hearing.
However, in respect of the orders relating to three assessment years, it can’t be disputed that the petitioner was not heard. Therefore, only on the ground of non-compliance of principles of natural justice in form of not giving opportunity of personal hearing, the Court set aside the impugned orders and directed concerned Authority to give personal hearing after which matter would to be decided afresh.
Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.
Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.
The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:
- The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
- All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
- Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
- Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
- All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
- The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
- Font and size that’s easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied