Order to Be Set Aside as No Extraneous Influence or Corrupt Motive Found and Petitioner Relied on Master File to Verify Cancelled E-Way Bills | HC
- Blog|News|GST & Customs|
- 2 Min Read
- By Taxmann
- |
- Last Updated on 1 April, 2025
Latest from Taxmann
Case Details: Y. Kayalvizhi vs. Secretary, Commercial Taxes and Registration Department - [2025] 172 taxmann.com 638 (Madras)
Judiciary and Counsel Details
- R. Vijayakumar, J.
-
Raja Karthikeyan, for the Petitioner.
-
A. Baskaran, Additional Government Pleader for the Respondent.
Facts of the Case
The petitioner, a statutory appellate authority under Section 109 of the Tamil Nadu GST Act, 2017, challenged disciplinary proceedings and a punishment order alleging negligence in handling appeals for Financial Year’s 2018-19 and 2019-20. A show cause notice under Rule 17 of the Tamil Nadu Civil Services (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1955, accused the petitioner of relying on cancelled E-way bills not submitted in appeal files. The disciplinary authority imposed a penalty of stoppage of increment for two years, which the appellate authority upheld. The petitioner contended that reliance was placed on the master file for verification and that, as a quasi-judicial officer, penalization for legal errors was unwarranted in the absence of extraneous influence or corrupt motives.
High Court Held
The Hon’ble High Court held that quasi-judicial officers cannot be penalized for mere errors of law unless extraneous influence or corrupt motives are established. Neither the disciplinary nor the appellate authority found that the cancelled E-way bills were absent from the master file, and no extraneous considerations were alleged. Consequently, the disciplinary proceedings and punishment were set aside, and the writ petition was allowed.
List of Cases Reviewed
- Zunjarrao Bhikaji Nagarkar v. Union of India & Others [(1999) 7 SCC 409] (para 24)
- Union of India v. K.K. Dhawan [(1993) 2 SCC 56] (para 24)
- State of Punjab v. Madan Mohan Lal Verma [(2019) 10 SCC 640] (para 24) followed
Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.
Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.
The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:
- The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
- All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
- Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
- Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
- All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
- The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
- Font and size that’s easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied
Everything on Tax and Corporate Laws of India
To subscribe to our weekly newsletter please log in/register on Taxmann.com
CA | CS | CMA
