Order Passed Without Giving Opportunity to Explain Discrepancies Between GSTR-1 and GSTR-3B Returns to Be Set Aside | HC
- News|Blog|GST & Customs|
- < 1 minute
- By Taxmann
- |
- Last Updated on 20 July, 2024

Case Details: Hajabandenawas v. State Tax Officer - [2024] 162 taxmann.com 920 (Madras)
Judiciary and Counsel Details
- N. Senthilkumar, J.
- S. Shamili for the Petitioner.
- C. Harsha Raj, Addl. Govt. Pleader (Tax) for the Respondent.
Facts of the Case
The petitioner is a registered person under GST and received notice for demand of tax, interest and penalty under Section 73 of CGST Act, 2017. It filed writ petition and contended that no opportunity was given to the petitioner to put forth their defence. It was also contended that there was a mismatch with regard to the GSTR-1 and the GSTR-3B returns filed by the petitioner.
High Court Held
The Honorable High Court noted that the impugned order was issued confirming the proposal of tax, interest and penalty. However, the petitioner was not given opportunity to submit explanation and documents regarding discrepancies. The Court also noted that if an opportunity of personal hearing is granted, the petitioner will demonstrate with documentary evidence with regard to the discrepancies between the GSTR-1 statement and the GSTR-3B returns.
Therefore, the Court held that the impugned order was liable to be set aside and matter was remanded back to the department for fresh consideration.
Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.

Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.
The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:
- The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
- All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
- Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
- Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
- All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
- The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
- Font and size that’s easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied

CA | CS | CMA