OP’s Refusal of Tri-Party Gas Supply Agreement Aligns with PNGRB Rules, Not Anti-Competitive | CCI

  • Blog|News|Competition Law|
  • 2 Min Read
  • By Taxmann
  • |
  • Last Updated on 17 January, 2025

Anti-competitive Conduct u/s 4

Case Details: AGI Greenpac Ltd. v. Bhagyanagar Gas Ltd. - [2025] 170 taxmann.com 400 (CCI)

Judiciary and Counsel Details

  • Ms Ravneet Kaur, Chairperson, Anil Agrawal, Ms Sweta Kakkad & Deepak Anurag, Member

Facts of the Case

In the instant case, the informant company was operating second largest container glass manufacturing facility in country. OP was engaged in business of distribution and marketing of natural gas and implementation of City Gas Distribution (CGD) project.

The OP was authorized by Petroleum and Natural Gas Regulatory Board (PNGRB) for implementation of CGD project. Informant entered into a Gas Sale Agreement (GSA) with the Opposite Party for sale and purchase of natural gas.

Later, informant filed information against OP alleging contravention of section 4. Informant alleged that OP was abusing its dominant position by charging unreasonably high prices. Informant also alleged that OP refused to enter into tri-partite agreement wherein informant would purchase natural gas from a third party and would use pipelines of OP for supply of same to its plant.

It was noted that by virtue of framework of PNGRB Act and regulations made thereunder, OP appeared to be a dominant player in relevant market for supply of natural gas to consumers having requirement up to 50,000 SCMD of gas in Hyderabad. It was noted that Informant had based its allegation on comparison of prices between Hyderabad and Bhongir plant.

CCI Held

The CCI observed that price in one relevant market could not be compared with other market, which operated under separate market conditions and, therefore, no case of excessive pricing was made out against OP.

Further, declaration of common carrier and/or giving authorization to act as a common carrier were governed by PNGRB Act and regulations framed thereunder and fell within purview of PNGRB and since OP had not been declared as a common carrier, OP could not have entered into a tri-partite agreement as sought by informant.

The CCI held that the conduct of OP for not agreeing to a tri-partite agreement could not be considered as anti-competitive under provisions of Act. Since no competition concern had arisen, matter was to be closed forthwith under section 26(2).

Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Everything on Tax and Corporate Laws of India

To subscribe to our weekly newsletter please log in/register on Taxmann.com

Author: Taxmann

Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.

The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:

  • The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
  • All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
  • Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
  • Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
  • All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
  • The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
  • Font and size that's easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied