[Opinion] The 2025 OECD Update on Fixed Place Permanent Establishment and Work from Home
- Blog|News|International Tax|
- 3 Min Read
- By Taxmann
- |
- Last Updated on 12 December, 2025
Latest from Taxmann
Sheetal Bhatia – [2025] 181 taxmann.com 279 (Article)
During the pandemic I advised a mid-sized engineering firm whose overseas project managers started working from their homes abroad. What seemed like a harmless operational tweak quickly raised a tax question – Could those home offices create a permanent establishment (PE) for the foreign enterprise?
The OECD’s 2025 update to the Model Tax Convention directly addresses that modern reality. Paragraph 29 of the Commentary on Article 5, alongwith practical examples now gives clearer guidance on when a home or other remote workplace becomes a fixed place PE.
1. What Does the 2025 OECD Update State?
Simply put, the OECD has clarified that a home or remote workplace becomes a fixed place PE only when it functions as a place of business of the enterprise and is at the enterprise’s disposal in a meaningful way.
Key factors to consider
- Degree of control and availability – Is the location made available by the enterprise (e.g., provided, required, or regularly used for business purposes)? If the enterprise requires the employee to use that place and it is used continuously, the risk of PE increases
- Regularity and continuity of activities – Intermittent or incidental use usually does not create a PE but continuous, core business activities carried out from the home are more likely to do so.
- Nature of activities – Administrative or preparatory tasks are less likely to create a PE than core revenue-generating activities.
- Enterprise’s provision of the space – If the enterprise provides the workspace, equipment, or pays for it, that strengthens the case for a PE.
- Expectation and contractual terms – Written policies, employment contracts, or client arrangements that require or expect work from that location are relevant evidence of intent and control.
2. Practical Illustrations by the OECD
The OECD commentary also provides fact-based scenarios to illustrate how the place of business test applies to homes and other personal spaces. One may use these scenarios as references before forming an opinion.
| S. No. | Scenarios | PE Risk | Premises |
| 1 | Employee normally works in Country R; post holidaying in Country S, rents a place there and works from that rented place for three straight months. | Low | Three months is temporary and lacks permanence |
| 2 | The same employee works from her home in Country S for one or two days per week throughout a twelve-month period (30% of working time) | Low | The home in Country S is a permanent place but the time spent is less than 50% of her total working time. |
| 3 | The same employee works from her home in Country S for 80 per cent of her working time in any twelve-month period. She regularly visits her clients in Country S for providing services. | High | The home in Country S is a permanent place and the time spent is also more than 50% of total working time. Further, the client visits show a clear commercial reason for the presence. |
| 4 | The same employee works from home in Country S for 60% of her working time in any twelve-month period. Her role is client-facing across multiple countries and works remotely. She meets a client in Country S once a quarter for a day. | Medium to Low | Home use exceeds 50% (which raises risk), but client meetings are intermittent and services are mainly delivered remotely. Thus, the risk of creation of fixed place PE would be medium to low, depending on overall facts and commercial purpose. |
| 5 | The same employee normally works from home in Country S. She provides services online to customers in Country R and other countries in different time zones. Because she works from Country S, she can be available in real time or near real time for those customers. | High | Home use exceeds 50% (which raises risk). Further, the employer benefits from the employee being in Country S because her location lets the company serve customers in other time zones effectively. Thus, the home would be considered as a Fixed Place PE. |
Click Here To Read The Full Article
Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.
Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.
The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:
- The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
- All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
- Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
- Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
- All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
- The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
- Font and size that’s easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied
Everything on Tax and Corporate Laws of India
To subscribe to our weekly newsletter please log in/register on Taxmann.com
CA | CS | CMA
