[Opinion] Deciphering the Chronology of ISD Mechanism | Insights into Budget 2024 Amendments
- Blog|News|GST & Customs|
- 2 Min Read
- By Chetan Kulasri
- |
- Last Updated on 7 February, 2024

Gaurav Jha – [2024] 159 taxmann.com 85 (Article)
1. Introduction
In the tumultuous landscape of the Goods and Services Tax (GST) regime since its inception, a relentless tussle has unfolded between taxpayers and tax authorities. The bone of contention? The mandatory embrace of the Input Service Distribution (ISD) mechanism and the thorny issue of entwining employee costs within the folds of Cross-charge transactions. This narrative seeks not only to unravel the historical backdrop but also to navigate the intriguing twists introduced by the recent Circular No.199/11/2023-GST. As we embark on this journey, we’ll uncover the pivotal discussions in the GST Council meetings and dissect the budget amendments that have played a transformative role in shaping this ever-evolving saga. Strap in for a ride through the maze of GST intricacies, where disputes meet clarifications, and the fiscal landscape undergoes a metamorphosis
2. Historical Disputes
Authors argue that GST law does not mandate Head Offices (HOs) to adopt the ISD mechanism for distributing Input Tax Credit (ITC) on input services procured from third parties. Instead, they assert that HOs can Cross-charge common input services to Branch Offices (BOs) through tax invoices. However, contrary Advance Rulings and a draft Circular, which was deferred during the 35th GST Council Meeting, and decision of 50th and 52nd Council Meeting along-with Budget Proposal created an environment of uncertainty and compleaxity.
3. Let us Understand the chronology
To comprehend the chronology surrounding Input Service Distributor (ISD) and Cross-Charge, let’s navigate through key developments. The authors initially underscore that GST law doesn’t mandate Head Offices (HOs) to adopt the ISD mechanism, advocating for Cross-Charging common input services to Branch Offices (BOs). However, the narrative becomes intricate due to conflicting Advance Rulings, a deferred Circular from the 35th GST Council Meeting, and pivotal decisions in the 50th and 52nd Council Meetings, including Budget Proposals. This chronological sequence weaves a tapestry of complexity and uncertainty in the realm of ISD and Cross-Charge dynamics
Click Here To Read The Full Article
Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.

CA | CS | CMA