Obtaining of MSME Certificate After CIRP Initiation Bars Promoters of CD to Submit Resolution Plan u/s 29A | NCLAT

  • Blog|News|Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code|
  • 2 Min Read
  • By Taxmann
  • |
  • Last Updated on 21 November, 2023

MSME certificate

Case Details: Hari Babu Thota, Resolution Professional of Shree Aashraya Infracon Ltd., In re - [2023] 156 taxmann.com 115 (NCLAT-Chennai)

Judiciary and Counsel Details

    • M. Venugopal, Judicial Member & Ms Shreesha Merla, Technical Member
    • Anant Merathia, Adv. for the Appellant.

Facts of the Case

In the instant case, the CIRP was initiated against the corporate debtor and the appellant was appointed Resolution Professional (RP). The Resolution plan for the revival of the corporate debtor was submitted by the promoters of the corporate debtor.

The CoC authorized the RP to submit the said resolution plan to the Adjudicating Authority (NCLT). Accordingly, the NCLT directed the appellant to file a copy of the MSME registration certificate of the corporate debtor on the basis of which promoters of MSME had claimed their eligibility to submit a resolution plan as per section 29A, read with section 240A of the IBC.

The NCLT rejected the resolution plan approved by the CoC on the ground that the resolution applicants were not eligible under section 29A, read with section 240A of the IBC.

Thereafter, the appellant filed an appeal before the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) against the order passed by the NCLT.

The appellant submitted that the resolution applicant was not disqualified as per primary conditions specified under section 29A of the IBC.

It was noted that an MSME certificate was obtained subsequent to the initiation of CIRP and, thus, such certificate was required to be ignored and resolution applicants were not eligible under 29A, read with section 240A of the IBC.

NCLAT Held

The NCLAT held that since such an unauthorized certificate application could not be considered, the NCLT had rightly rejected the resolution plan.

List of Cases Reviewed

List of Cases Referred to

Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Everything on Tax and Corporate Laws of India

To subscribe to our weekly newsletter please log in/register on Taxmann.com

Author: Taxmann

Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.

The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:

  • The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
  • All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
  • Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
  • Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
  • All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
  • The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
  • Font and size that's easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied