No TDS on Compensation for Compulsory Land Acquisition | HC
- Blog|News|Income Tax|
- 2 Min Read
- By Taxmann
- |
- Last Updated on 17 May, 2026

Case Details: Executive Engineer vs. State - [2026] 186 taxmann.com 74 (Karnataka)
Judiciary and Counsel Details
- Suraj Govindaraj, J.
-
Sanjeev Kumar C. Patil, Adv. for the Petitioner.
-
Shashikiran Shetty, AG, Malhar Rao, AAG, Smt. Maya T.R., HCGP & Harshavardhan R. Malipatil, Adv. for the Respondent.
Facts of the Case
The Karnataka High Court in the case of Executive Engineer, Karnataka Neeravari Nigam Limited v. State held that compensation awarded on account of compulsory acquisition of land is not subject to deduction of tax at source under the applicable provisions of the Income Tax Act.
The parties to the writ petition were the beneficiaries of the land acquisition, and the acquisition proceedings had been pending for an inordinately long period. The parties were constrained to initiate proceedings to enforce the decrees passed against the beneficiary of the acquisition, indicating the protracted nature of the litigation and the absence of finality.
Further, the land losers have not received the compensation amounts within a reasonable or statutorily contemplated timeframe. The beneficiary of the acquisition, as well as the State Government, would be exposed to an ever-increasing financial burden on account of the accrual of statutory interest, additional interest, and other consequential liabilities during the pendency of the proceedings.
High Court Held
Accordingly, the High Court suggested that the parties refer their disputes to mediation, with a view to facilitating a comprehensive, mutually acceptable, and time-bound settlement, thereby bringing a quietus to the long-pending disputes between the parties. Pursuant to the suggestion, the parties signed a Mediation Agreement, which was placed on record before the High Court.
The High Court held that all payments made pursuant to the Mediation Agreement, whether to joint accounts or individual accounts, shall be effected without any deduction of tax at source.
List of Cases Reviewed
- W.P.No.102884/2025 order dated 20.08.2025 (para 23) followed
Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.

Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.
The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:
- The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
- All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
- Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
- Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
- All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
- The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
- Font and size that’s easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied

CA | CS | CMA