No ST on amount retained on forfeiture of earnest money deposit for non-delivery of goods

  • News|Blog|GST & Customs|
  • 2 Min Read
  • By Taxmann
  • |
  • Last Updated on 29 November, 2021

Service Tax - Forfeiture of earnest money deposit - Compensation for non-delivery of goods

Case Details: Tirupati Balaji Furnaces (P.) Ltd. v. Commissioner, Central Goods and Service Tax - [2021] 132 taxmann.com 264 (New Delhi - CESTAT)

Judiciary and Counsel Details

    • Rachna Gupta, Judicial Member
    • B.L. Yadav, Adv. for the Appellant. 
    • Mahesh Bhardwaj, AR for the Respondent.

Facts of the Case

The appellant was engaged in the manufacture of MS ingots. During the course of audit of records of the appellant, some miscellaneous income was observed on account of non performance of the agreement to sale and non-compliance of the conditions of contract of supplier of goods. The alleged that it would amount to agreeing to the obligation to refrain from any, or to tolerate an act or a situation, or to do an act’ and thus a consideration towards a ‘declared service’.

The show cause notice was issued and service tax demand raised towards the amount received on account of forfeiture of earnest money and on account of a sum being received as compensation for non-delivery of goods. The appeal was filed and it was rejected and thereafter, the appellant filed appeal before the Tribunal.

CESTAT Held

The Honorable Tribunal observed that the appellant was not carrying out any activity to receive compensation. The purpose of compensation was to ensure that the default would not be undertaken again or repeated. Moreover, from any stretch of imagination, the retention of earnest money cannot be said to be an act of receiving consideration towards toleration of the defaulting act of the other parties. Hence the question of tolerating the act of default as alleged by the department would not arise at all and appeal to be allowed.

Case Review

List of Cases Referred to

Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Everything on Tax and Corporate Laws of India

To subscribe to our weekly newsletter please log in/register on Taxmann.com

Author: Taxmann

Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.

The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:

  • The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
  • All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
  • Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
  • Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
  • All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
  • The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
  • Font and size that's easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied