No Penalty Can Be Imposed Under Gst Act for Human Error in Mentioning Place of Delivery in E-Way Bill | HC
- News|Blog|GST & Customs|
- 2 Min Read
- By Taxmann
- |
- Last Updated on 13 August, 2024

Case Details: Uttam Electric Store v. State of U.P. - [2024] 165 taxmann.com 264 (Allahabad)
Judiciary and Counsel Details
- Piyush Agrawal, J.
- Suyash Agarwal for the Petitioner.
Facts of the Case
The petitioner was engaged in the business of supply of electrical goods. It supplied electrical goods to a company in Chandpur (UP) and the goods were consigned to Aligarh. The e-way bill was also generated but in the e-way bill, the place of delivery was mentioned as “Chandpur (UP)”, instead of the consignee of Aligarh. The goods were detained on its onward journey on the ground that the goods were being dispatched to a place different than mentioned in the documents.
Thereafter, proceedings under section 129 of the UPGST Act were initiated and show cause notice was issued. The penalty order was passed and appeal was also filed but the same was rejected. It filed writ petition against the detention of goods.
High Court Held
The Honorable High Court noted that the error could occur due to human error while filling up the form/e-way bill. In the present case, there was no pleading on behalf of Revenue that there was any intention to evade tax and no finding was recorded by any of the authorities that there was a mens rea for evading payment of tax. Therefore, it was held that the impugned order was not sustainable and liable to be set aside.
List of Cases Reviewed
- Nancy Trading Company v. State of U.P. [Writ Tax No. 892 of 2023, decided on 15-7-2024], relied on.
Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.

Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.
The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:
- The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
- All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
- Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
- Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
- All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
- The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
- Font and size that’s easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied

CA | CS | CMA