No Part Adjudication of SCN Issued Under CGST Act; Directs Assessee to Appear Before Authority for Order

  • Blog|News|GST & Customs|
  • 2 Min Read
  • By Taxmann
  • |
  • Last Updated on 14 February, 2025

CGST Act Adjudication

Case Details: Deputy Commissioner (Intelligence) v. Minimol Sabu- [2025] 171 taxmann.com 216 (Kerala)

Judiciary and Counsel Details

  • Dr. A.K. Jayasankaran Nambiar & Easwaran S., JJ.
  • Smt. Resmitha Ramachandran, Government Pleader for the Appellant.
  • Akhil Suresh, Adv. for the Respondent.

Facts of the Case

The assessee, engaged in the sale of gold, silver, and diamond ornaments, was subjected to a search by tax authorities, during which data was retrieved from the “Gold Mine” billing software. Based on this data, an SCN under Section 74 of the CGST Act was issued, alleging suppression of outward supplies. The assessee challenged the SCN, arguing that it lacked cause of action and was erroneously issued against a separate entity with a different GST registration. It contended that this jurisdictional issue should be adjudicated first before proceeding with the substantive tax determination.

Accepting this argument, a Single Judge directed the proper officer to rule on this preliminary issue before addressing the merits of the SCN. Aggrieved by this order, the revenue filed the present appeal, asserting that the CGST Act does not allow adjudication in stages and that all issues must be determined in a single proceeding.

High Court Held

The Honourable High Court noted that the CGST Act does not permit adjudication in stages and held that all issues must be determined in a single, comprehensive proceeding. It emphasized that staged adjudication could lead to procedural inefficiencies and an unnecessary accrual of interest on any tax liability ultimately found due. The Court further held that writ jurisdiction under Article 226 cannot be invoked merely to challenge an SCN unless there is a patent lack of jurisdiction, which was not applicable in this case. Accordingly, the Court set aside the Single Judge’s order and directed the assessee to participate in the adjudication process.

List of Cases Reviewed

  • Judgment Dated 22.11.2024 IN WP(C) NO.40226 OF 2024 of High Court of Kerala (Para 4) reversed.

List of Cases Referred to

  • 10. In D.P.Maheswari v. Delhi Administration & Ors [(1983) 4 SCC 293 (para 10).

Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Everything on Tax and Corporate Laws of India

To subscribe to our weekly newsletter please log in/register on Taxmann.com

Author: Taxmann

Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.

The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:

  • The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
  • All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
  • Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
  • Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
  • All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
  • The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
  • Font and size that's easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied