NCLT Rules Debt Securing Group Company Dues Not Financial Debt Under IBC

  • Blog|News|Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code|
  • 2 Min Read
  • By Chetan Kulasri
  • |
  • Last Updated on 23 September, 2025

NCLT ruling financial debt IBC group company dues

Case Details: Asset Reconstruction Company (India) Ltd. vs. Sanjay Vijay Jeswani - [2025] 178 taxmann.com 373 (NCLT - Mum.)

Judiciary and Counsel Details

  • Sushil Mahadeorao Kochey, Judicial Member
  • Prabhat Kumar, Technical Member
  • Navroz Seervai for the Applicant
  • Amir Arsiwala for the Respondent

Facts of the Case

In the instant case, the corporate debtor had mortgaged its properties to secure loans from the L&T Group, which were granted to other entities in the Xrbia Group to develop housing in the form of residential townships.
The applicant-Asset Reconstruction Company entered into an assignment agreement with L&T Group and acquired all rights pertaining to the extant financial facilities bestowed upon Xrbia Group. The CIRP was initiated against the corporate debtor.
The applicant submitted its claim to the Interim Resolution Professional (IRP) along with interest covered by a security interest created by the corporate debtor by way of mortgage, personal guarantees, and share pledge agreements furnished against various term loan facilities.
However, the IRP rejected the applicant’s claim as a financial debt on the ground that the loan agreements read with the mortgage documents only contemplated the creation of a mortgage over the assets of the corporate debtor in favour of the lender to secure the debt availed and disbursed to other Xrbia Group companies, and no contract of guarantee could be read in those documents.
It was noted that since there was no promise to pay debt on the part of the corporate debtor, and it was a case of simpliciter creation of mortgage in favour of the lender to further securitise their debt owed by other Xrbia Group companies, said debt could not fall within clause (h) of section 5(8) of the IBC.

NCLT Held

The NCLT held that, in such a case, disbursal of debt to a corporate debtor was a sine qua non to constitute debt as financial debt qua corporate debtor. Thus, the applicant’s claim did not fall within the definition of Section 5(8) of the IBC and therefore did not qualify as financial debt. However, in view of the security interest over the property of the Corporate Debtor held by the applicant in relation to these debts, such debts would fall under the category of other secured debt.

List of Cases Referred To

Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Everything on Tax and Corporate Laws of India

To subscribe to our weekly newsletter please log in/register on Taxmann.com