NCLT Rightly Initiated CIRP as CD Failed to Pay for Completed Work, Despite Verified Bills | NCLAT

  • Blog|News|Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code|
  • 2 Min Read
  • By Taxmann
  • |
  • Last Updated on 23 February, 2024

Verified Bills

Case Details: Ashok Singh v. Babu Lal Sharma - [2024] 159 taxmann.com 529 (NCLAT- New Delhi)

Judiciary and Counsel Details

  • Ashok Bhushan, Chairperson
  • Barun Mitra & Arun Baroka, Technical Member
  • Vivek JainBhrigu Sharma & Rajat Jain, Advs. for the Appellant
  • Priyesh Kasliwal Bipin Garg & Ms Sangita Mishra, Advs. for the Respondent.

Facts of the Case

In the instant case, the corporate debtor entered into a sub-contractor agreement with respondent no. 2 (i.e. operational creditor), in which the operational creditor undertook to complete the construction project.

Thereafter, the operational creditor raised various invoices against the corporate debtor. Since, the corporate debtor failed to pay any amount even after work had been done and also after running bills have been signed and verified by technical persons of the corporate debtor and, thus, the operational creditor filed a petition u/s 9 of the IBC against the corporate debtor.

The Adjudicating Authority (NCLT) vide the impugned order admitted the said petition. The appellant (i.e. suspended director of corporate debtor) filed the instant appeal on the ground that despite pre-existing dispute with respect to the outstanding amount and quality of work rendered by the operational creditor, the NCLT admitted the CIRP petition and, thus, the same was to be set aside.

Thereafter, an appeal was made to the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) against the order passed by the NCLT.

It was noted that apart from Rs. 11 lacs, which was paid as mobilisation advance, no other payments had been made, even though running bills had been sent over a period of time. Further, it was noted that no dispute had been raised with respect to running the bill and no reply was issued to demand notice.

The NCLAT observed that the corporate debtor had not been replying to all communications and very belatedly raised the issue that work had not been done as per the sub-contractor agreement.

The NCLAT, further observed that the invoices raised by the operational creditor were verified and confirmed by the technical person, and the appellant also paid GST on work, even though the due amount was to be paid by the corporate debtor.

NCLAT Held

The NCLAT held that the NCLT had rightly concluded that there was a debt, which was more than Rs. 1 lacs and due and had not been paid.

Further, the NCLAT held that the corporate debtor defaulted in making full payments against services rendered by the operational creditor and, therefore, the NCLT had rightly proceeded for CIRP proceedings u/s 9 of the IBC.

List of Cases Reviewed

  • RG Colonizers (P.) Ltd. v. Macro Infra Contractors (P.) Ltd. [2024] 159 taxmann.com (NCLT -Jaipur)(para 30) affirmed See Annex

Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Everything on Tax and Corporate Laws of India

To subscribe to our weekly newsletter please log in/register on Taxmann.com

Author: Taxmann

Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.

The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:

  • The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
  • All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
  • Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
  • Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
  • All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
  • The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
  • Font and size that's easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied