NCLT rejected CIRP plea u/s 94 as bank took no action against appellant-guarantor

  • Blog|News|Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code|
  • 2 Min Read
  • By Taxmann
  • |
  • Last Updated on 24 March, 2023

CIRP plea u/s 94

Case Details: Amanjyot Singh v. Navneet Kumar Jain - [2023] 148 taxmann.com 72 (NCLAT-New Delhi)

Judiciary and Counsel Details

    • Justice Ashok Bhushan, Chairperson Kanthi Narahari & Barun Mitra, Technical Member
    • Rajesh BohraS. Bohra, Advs. for the Appellant.
    • Amit SharmaNavneet Kumar JainGautam, Advs. for the Respondent.
    • Rajesh BohraSangeeta Bohra, Advs. Navneet Kumar Jain, RP, Amit SharmaGautam Singhal, Advs. & Rajat Chaudhary, Advs. for the Appearing Parties.

Facts of the Case

In the instant case, the corporate debtor had obtained financial facilities from the financial creditor banks, and the appellant (i.e. a guarantor of the corporate debtor) stood as a personal guarantor.

Thereafter, the financial creditor bank issued a notice u/s 13 of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (SARFAESI Act) against the corporate debtor and personal guarantors. The mortgaged properties were sold and a part of the loan was recovered.

Then, the corporate debtor filed an application u/s 10 of the IBC before the Adjudicating Authority (NCLT) to initiate the CIRP, which was admitted by the NCLT. Subsequently, the appellant filed an application u/s 94 of the IBC, claiming that he had committed a default in making an outstanding payment.

However, the NCLT rejected the said application by the impugned order on the ground that the appellant had not produced any document. Thereafter, an appeal was made to the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) against the order passed by the NCLT.

NCLAT Held

The NCLAT observed that the bank had only auctioned mortgaged properties that were held as a security interest and had recovered a part of the loan amount. However, no steps had been taken by the bank to invoke a guarantee or recover any amount from the appellant.

The NCLAT held that since no substantial steps had been taken by the financial creditor bank against the appellant for recovery of any outstanding dues and the guarantee of the appellant had not been invoked, there was no sufficient ground to admit the application filed u/s 94 for initiating the CIRP against the appellant. Accordingly, the appeal was to be dismissed.

List of Cases Reviewed

Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Everything on Tax and Corporate Laws of India

To subscribe to our weekly newsletter please log in/register on Taxmann.com

Author: Taxmann

Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.

The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:

  • The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
  • All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
  • Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
  • Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
  • All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
  • The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
  • Font and size that's easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied