NCLT can Replace the Liquidator if he isn’t Holding a Valid Authorisation for Assignment

  • Blog|News|Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code|
  • 2 Min Read
  • By Taxmann
  • |
  • Last Updated on 20 April, 2023

Replacement of Liquidator

Case Details: CA V. Venkata Sivakumar v. IDBI Bank Ltd. - [2023] 149 taxmann.com 60 (NCLAT-Chennai)

Judiciary and Counsel Details

    • M. Venugopal, Judicial Member & Naresh Salecha, Technical Member
    • V. Venkata SivakumarArun Kathpalia, Sr. Adv., Varun Srinivasan, Adv., P. Wilson Sr. Adv. Ms N. KalaivaniJ. Manivannan, Advs. for the Appearing Parties.

Facts of the Case

In the instant case, the appellant was appointed as the liquidator of a corporate debtor pursuant to a liquidation order dated 29-5-2020. However, after examining the appellant’s documents, the respondent (i.e. bank), who was a financial creditor, found that the appellant did not have a valid Authorisation for Assignment (AFA).

The respondent then filed an application before the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) seeking the replacement of the appellant.

Regulation 7A of the IBBI (Insolvency Professionals) Regulations, 2016, states that no insolvency professional shall accept or undertake any assignment after 31-12-2019 unless he holds a valid AFA on the date of acceptance or commencement of such assignment. The appellant received a valid AFA on 30-12-2020, which was after his appointment as liquidator. Therefore, NCLT passed an order to replace the appellant with new liquidator.

The Appellant aggrieved by the order of NCLT, filed an appeal to the National Company Law Appellant Tribunal (NCLAT).

NCLAT Held

The NCLAT, held that the appellant did not possess the legally required AFA on the date of acceptance of the assignment, and thus, there was no error in the impugned order passed by NCLT to replace the appellant with a new liquidator.

The NCLAT further held that the liquidator has no personal rights to continue in the liquidation process, and the NCLT has the power to appoint and remove liquidator for reasons it finds fit, just, valid, and proper.

This power is derived from Section 60, read with Sections 33 and 34 of the IBC, which deals with the powers and functions of the corporate persons adjudicating authorities, including the NCLT.

In conclusion, the case underscores the importance of complying with the legal requirements for accepting assignments under the IBC, and the broad powers of the NCLT in appointing and removing liquidators for reasons it deems fit.

List of Cases Reviewed

List of Cases Referred to

Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Everything on Tax and Corporate Laws of India

To subscribe to our weekly newsletter please log in/register on Taxmann.com

Author: Taxmann

Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.

The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:

  • The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
  • All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
  • Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
  • Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
  • All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
  • The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
  • Font and size that's easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied