Medical Sales Representative Not a ‘Workman’ Under ID Act | HC
- Blog|News|Labour & Industrial Laws|
- 2 Min Read
- By Taxmann
- |
- Last Updated on 29 December, 2025

Case Details: Sh. Samarendra Das vs. Win Medicare (P.) Ltd. [2025] 181 taxmann.com 184 (Delhi)
Judiciary and Counsel Details
- Tara Vitasta Ganju, J.
-
Gautam Kumar Laha, Adv. for the Petitioner.
-
Ms Pooja Sood, Aniket Singh, Jitesh Pandey, Hrishabh Tiwari & Naman Arora, Advs. for the Respondent.
Facts of the Case
In the instant case, the petitioner was employed as a sales executive/professional sales representative with the respondent company. The petitioner filed a claim petition before the Labour Court, which was dismissed on the ground that the petitioner was not a workman within the meaning of section 2(s) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.
It was noted that the petitioner was not engaged in clerical or menial work but was a qualified graduate with a specialisation and had received specialised training for his field of work. There was, therefore, no doubt that the work performed by the petitioner involved specialised skills acquired through training imparted by the respondent company. In any event, this aspect had not been denied by the petitioner.
High Court Held
The High Court held that there was no infirmity in the impugned order warranting interference in the exercise of its supervisory jurisdiction.
List of Cases Referred to
- H.R. Adyanthaya v. Sandoz (India) Ltd. 1994 taxmann.com 2463 (SC) (para 5)
- Petcare, Division of Tetragon Chemie Pvt. Ltd. v. M.P. Medical and Sales Representatives Association Bhopal 2006 SCC OnLine MP 23 (para 9)
- Bharat Bhawan Trust v. Bharat Bhawan Artists’ Association 2001 taxmann.com 4991 (SC) (para 12.1)
- T.P. Srivastava v. National Tobacco Co. of India Limited (1992) 1 SCC 281 (para 12.1)
- Syed Yakoob v. K.S. Radhakrishnan 1963 SCC OnLine SC 24 (para 15).
Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.

Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.
The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:
- The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
- All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
- Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
- Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
- All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
- The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
- Font and size that’s easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied

CA | CS | CMA