MCA Proposes IEPFA Rule Amendments for Faster Investor Refunds
- Blog|News|Company Law|
- 2 Min Read
- By Taxmann
- |
- Last Updated on 30 January, 2026

Press Release; Dated: 29.01.2026
The Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA), through the Investor Education and Protection Fund Authority (IEPFA), has invited public comments on the proposed amendments to the IEPFA (Accounting, Audit, Transfer and Refund) Rules, 2016. The proposed changes are aimed at improving the efficiency, transparency, and investor-friendliness of the IEPF refund framework.
1. Objective of the Proposed Amendments
The key objective of the amendments is to simplify existing procedures, reduce documentation burdens, and significantly expedite the processing of refund claims. The focus is particularly on low-value claims, which currently face delays despite their relatively straightforward nature.
2. Faster Disposal Timeline for Refund Claims
A major reform proposed under the amendments is the introduction of a defined timeline for claim disposal. Refund claims—especially low-value ones—are proposed to be processed and disposed of within 30 days, subject to verification by the concerned company. This is expected to bring predictability and accountability into the refund process.
3. Definition of Low-Value Claims
For the purpose of fast-track processing, the amendments define “low-value claims” as follows:
- Physical shares with a market value of up to ₹5 lakh
- Dematerialised shares with a market value of up to ₹15 lakh
- Dividend claims of up to ₹10,000
These categories are intended to cover the majority of small investors seeking refunds from the IEPF.
4. Simplification and Rationalisation of Procedures
The proposed amendments also seek to bring enhanced procedural clarity by:
- Rationalising documentation requirements
- Eliminating repetitive and unnecessary compliance steps
- Clearly defining the roles and responsibilities of companies involved in verification and processing
This is expected to reduce friction for both investors and companies.
5. Introduction of a Formal Appeal Mechanism
To further strengthen investor protection, the amendments propose the introduction of a formal appeal mechanism. This will allow claimants to challenge the rejection of refund claims through a structured process, ensuring greater transparency, accountability, and fairness in decision-making.
6. Towards a More Investor-Friendly Refund Framework
Overall, the proposed amendments reflect MCA’s intent to make the IEPF refund process faster, more transparent, and aligned with investor-centric governance. By streamlining procedures and introducing clear timelines and safeguards, the changes aim to restore investor confidence and improve ease of compliance.
Click Here To Read The Full Press Release
Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.

Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.
The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:
- The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
- All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
- Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
- Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
- All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
- The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
- Font and size that’s easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied

CA | CS | CMA