Madras HC Directed GST Dept. To Provide Another Opportunity of Hearing to Assessee Who Wasn’t Aware of Proceedings
- Blog|News|GST & Customs|
- < 1 minute
- By Taxmann
- |
- Last Updated on 8 April, 2024
Image
Case Details: Mrs. Preetha v. Deputy Commercial Tax Officer - [2024] 161 taxmann.com 131 (Madras)
Judiciary and Counsel Details
- Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy, J.
- A.N.R. Jayaprathap & V. Anandhamoorthy for the Petitioner.
- V. Prashanth Kiran for the Respondent.
Facts of the Case
The petitioner was engaged in trading of electrical and hardware goods. It received a notice in Form GST ASMT-10 and proceedings were initiated against the petitioner. It filed writ petition against the demand order and contended that it was unable to respond to the intimation and show cause notice because such notices were only uploaded on the GST portal and not communicated by any other mode.
High Court Held
The Honorable High Court noted that the impugned order was passed on account of petitioner not being heard before the impugned order was issued, and was unable to contest the tax demand. However, it should be noticed that the petitioner did not fulfil the obligation of monitoring the GST portal continually in spite of being a registered person.
Therefore, the Court held that the impugned order was liable to be quashed and the petitioner was directed to remit 10% of the disputed tax demand. The Court also directed the department to provide a reasonable opportunity to the petitioner, including a personal hearing, and thereafter issue a fresh order within two months from the date of receipt of the petitioner’s reply.
Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.

Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.
The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:
- The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
- All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
- Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
- Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
- All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
- The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
- Font and size that’s easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied

CA | CS | CMA