Liquidator Fee Limited After Liquidation Completion | NCLT
- Blog|News|Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code|
- 2 Min Read
- By Taxmann
- |
- Last Updated on 23 January, 2026

Case Details: P.M. Cold Storage (P.) Ltd. vs. Goouksheer Farm Fresh (P.) Ltd. [2025] 180 taxmann.com 849 (NCLT - Kolkata)
Judiciary and Counsel Details
- Labh Singh, Judicial Member
- Ms. Rekha Kantilal Shah, Technical Member
- Kuldip Mallick, Ms. Pallavi Ray, S. Dutta, Advs. Niraj Kumar, CS for the Appearing Parties.
Facts of the Case
In the instant case, the corporate Debtor was admitted into the CIRP and, as no resolution plan was received, the liquidation was ordered, and the applicant was appointed as the liquidator.
The liquidator thereafter filed an application seeking dissolution of the corporate debtor. It was noted that all assets of the corporate debtor had been disposed of and distributed in accordance with the Code and rules and regulations framed thereunder, and the final report had been submitted.
Further, it was noted that since the 4th SCC meeting, the Tribunal had considered circumstances necessitating the end of the liquidation process of the corporate debtor; therefore, the Financial Creditor was to be directed to proceed forthwith with the section 66 Application.
NCLT Held
The NCLT observed that since the liquidation process was fully complete and the Liquidator, in compliance, had filed the present application under section 54 of the IBC seeking an order of dissolution of the corporate debtor, dissolution of the corporate debtor was to be ordered and, consequently, the Liquidator stood relieved from his responsibilities, subject to procedural compliances.
The NCLT held that since the Liquidator’s fees claimed to the tune of Rs. 4.80 lakhs were more than double and no tangible basis or supporting rationale had been demonstrated justifying such a fee, the Liquidator was directed to consider the payment already made to be full and final and reduce the fees to the extent liquidation expenses were not paid for.
Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.

Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.
The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:
- The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
- All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
- Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
- Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
- All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
- The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
- Font and size that’s easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied

CA | CS | CMA