ITAT Treats Doubtful Debts and Taxes as Operating Expenses Under TNMM
- Blog|News|Income Tax|
- 4 Min Read
- By Taxmann
- |
- Last Updated on 17 May, 2026

Case Details: Wipro GE Healthcare (P.) Ltd. vs. DCIT [2026] 186 taxmann.com 324 (Bangalore-Trib.)
Judiciary and Counsel Details
- Keshav Dubey, Judicial Member & Waseem Ahmed, Accountant Member
-
Dhinalshah, Adv. for the Appellant.
-
Dr Divya K.J., CIT (DR) for the Respondent.
Facts of the Case
The assessee was engaged in contract manufacturing, distribution of medical products, software and engineering design services, and ITeS services. During transfer pricing proceedings, the TPO treated provisions for doubtful debts and rates & taxes as non-operating expenses while computing operating margins of the assessee and comparable companies under TNMM.
The assessee contended that the provision for doubtful debts had a direct nexus with operating revenue, as it arose from trade receivables generated in the normal course of business. It was further submitted that rates and taxes comprised statutory levies such as customs duty, road tax and similar charges incurred in connection with regular business operations and therefore constituted operating expenditure.
The matter reached before the Bangalore Tribunal.
ITAT Held
The Tribunal held that the provision for doubtful debts was intrinsically linked with sales and realisation of trade receivables and therefore constituted an operating expense for the purpose of computing margins under TNMM. The Tribunal also observed that rates and taxes arising from routine business operations could not be treated as non-operating merely because they were statutory levies.
Accordingly, the ITAT directed the AO/TPO to treat both provisions for doubtful debts and rates & taxes as operating items while recomputing the operating margins of the assessee as well as comparable companies.
List of Cases Reviewed
- Wipro GE Healthcare (P.) Ltd. v. ACIT [2023] 154 taxmann.com 97 (Bangalore – Trib.) (para 27.28)
- Wipro GE Healthcare (P.) Ltd. v. Dy. CIT [2023] 149 taxmann.com 302 (Bangalore-Trib.) (para 27.50)
- NXP India (P.) Ltd. v. Dy. CIT [2020] 116 taxmann.com 421 (Bangalore – Trib.) (para 55.12)
- Pr. CIT v. Inductis India (P.) Ltd. [2023] 157 taxmann.com 87 (Delhi) (para 71.3) followed
- Willis Processing Services (I) (P.) Ltd. v. Dy. CIT [2013] 30 taxmann.com 350 (Mumbai) (para 27.73) distinguished
List of Cases Referred to
- AMD India (P.) Ltd. v. Dy. CIT [2025] 180 taxmann.com 324 (Bangalore – Trib.) (para 13.3)
- Asstt. CIT v. McAfee Software (India) (P.) Ltd. [2016] 68 taxmann.com 293 (Bangalore – Trib.) (para 25)
- CIT v. Pentair Water India (P.) Ltd. [2016] 69 taxmann.com 180/381 ITR 216 (Bombay) (para 25)
- IG Infotech (India) (P.) Ltd. v. ACIT [2023] 150 taxmann.com 470 (Bangalore – Trib.) (para 27. 4)
- Quicklogic Software (India) (P.) Ltd. v. Dy. CIT [2022] 142 taxmann.com 482 (Bangalore – Trib.) (para 27. 4)
- Dotgo (P.) Ltd. v. Dy. CIT [2025] 177 taxmann.com 450 (Bangalore – Trib.) (para 27. 4)
- Wipro GE Healthcare (P.) Ltd. v. ACIT [2023] 154 taxmann.com 97 (Bangalore – Trib.) (para 27.10)
- Wipro GE Healthcare (P.) Ltd. v. Dy. CIT [IT Appeal No. 291 (Bang.) of 2022, dated 15-3-2023] (para 27.19)
- Trilogy E-Business Software India (P.) Ltd. v. Dy. CIT [2013] 29 taxmann.com 310/140 ITD 540 (Bangalore – Trib.) (para 27.26)
- SAP India (P.) Ltd. v. Dy. CIT [2025] 180 taxmann.com 631 (Bangalore – Trib.) (para 27.3)
- Hydro BS India (P.) Ltd. v. Dy. CIT [2025] 178 taxmann.com 229 (Bangalore – Trib.) (para 27.3)
- Concur Technologies (India) (P.) Ltd. v. Asstt. CIT [2025] 180 taxmann.com 447 (Bangalore – Trib.) (para 27.3)
- Wipro GE Healthcare (P.) Ltd. v. Dy. CIT [2023] 149 taxmann.com 302 (Bangalore – Trib.) (para 27.45)
- Autodesk India (P.) Ltd. v. Dy. CIT [2018] 96 taxmann.com 263 (Bangalore – Trib.) (para 27.66)
- Robert Bosch Engineering and Business Solutions (P.) Ltd. v. Dy. CIT [IT(TP)A No. 593/Bang/2020, dated 9-12-2024] (para 27.67)
- Scancafe Digital Solutions (P.) Ltd. v. ITO [2018] 94 taxmann.com 515 (Bengaluru – Trib.) (para 27.72)
- Willis Processing Services (I) (P.) Ltd. v. Dy. CIT [2013] 30 taxmann.com 350 (Mumbai) (para 27.72)
- CIT v. Hindustan Unilever Ltd. [2016] 72 taxmann.com 325/[2017] 394 ITR 73 (Bombay) (para 46.1)
- CIT v. Hindustan Unilever Ltd. [2018] 99 taxmann.com 135/259 Taxman 218 (SC) (para 46.1)
- NXP India (P.) Ltd. v. Dy. CIT [2020] 116 taxmann.com 421 (Bangalore – Trib.) (para 55.11)
- Mobis India Ltd. v. Dy. CIT [2013] 38 taxmann.com 231 (Chennai – Trib.) (para 56.1)
- Pr. CIT v. Kusum Health Care (P.) Ltd. [2018] 99 taxmann.com 431/[2017] 398 ITR 66 (Delhi) (para 66)
- Highways Construction Co. (P.) Ltd. v. CIT [1993] 199 ITR 702 (Gauhati) (para 66.2)
- Bechtel India (P.) Ltd. v. Asstt. CIT [2017] 85 taxmann.com 121 (Delhi – Trib.) (para 67.1)
- Pr. CIT v. Inductis India (P.) Ltd. [2023] 157 taxmann.com 87 (Delhi) (para 71.2)
- Pr. CIT v. Inductis India (P.) Ltd. [2025] 175 taxmann.com 423 (SC) (para 71.2)
- Cummins India Ltd. v. Asstt. CIT [2023] 153 taxmann.com 223/294 Taxman 619 (Bombay) (para 74.13)
- Sony Ericsson Mobile Communications India (P.) Ltd. v. CIT [2015] 55 taxmann.com 240/231 Taxman 113/374 ITR 118 (Delhi) (para 74.14)
- CIT v. EKL Appliances Ltd. [2012] 24 taxmann.com 199/209 Taxman 200/345 ITR 241 (Delhi) (para 74.19)
- Wipro GE Healthcare (P.) Ltd. v. ACIT [IT (TP) Appeal Nos. 701 & 702 (Bang.) of 2021, dated 5-8-2022] (para 74.21)
- Dy. CIT v. Toyota Kirloskar Motor (P.) Ltd. [2024] 168 taxmann.com 603 (Bangalore – Trib.) (para 79.7).
Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.

Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.
The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:
- The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
- All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
- Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
- Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
- All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
- The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
- Font and size that’s easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied

CA | CS | CMA