ITAT Rules PCIT Has Jurisdiction to Cancel 12AA Registration After Transfer
- Blog|News|Income Tax|
- 4 Min Read
- By Taxmann
- |
- Last Updated on 9 October, 2025

Case Details: Advantage India v. Principal Commissioner of Income-tax - [2025] 178 taxmann.com 605 (Delhi - Trib.)
Judiciary and Counsel Details
- Vikas Awasthy, Judicial Member
- Naveen Chandra, Accountant Member
- Sanjay Mehra, FCA for the Applicant
- Javed Akhtar, CIT [DR] for the Respondent
Facts of the Case
The assessee was a society that had been granted registration under Section 12AA. The society was also registered under FCRA. The assessee was engaged in educational and social activities. A search operation was conducted on the Deepak Talwar Group, and a simultaneous survey operation was carried out on the assessee society.
During the said search/survey action, the revenue found incriminating material and documents, which showed that the society was used as a tool and instrumentality for camouflaging huge tax evasion and for channelling unaccounted and tainted funds from overseas clients of the society’s president, along with tax evasion.
Based on the search findings, the Assessing Officer (Central) forwarded a proposal for cancellation of registration to the Principal Commissioner along with a copy of the Inspection Report by the FCRA Wing of the Ministry of Home Affairs, which observed a violation of FCRA. The Principal Commissioner issued a show-cause notice (SCN), leading to the cancellation of the registration granted under Section 12AA. The matter reached the Delhi Tribunal.
Tribunal Held
The Tribunal held that the assessee’s substantial jurisdictional/legal issue concerned the assumption of jurisdiction regarding whether the PCIT(C) had the power to withdraw/cancel the registration granted under Section 12AA of the Act. The other issues related to the invocation of Section 12AA(3) without fulfilling the requisite conditions therein, and the cancellation of registration granted under Section 12AA with retrospective effect.
When the PAN is transferred from the CIT(Exemptions) charge to the Pr. CIT(Central) charge, the entire ‘case’ and the associated ‘proceedings’ will be transferred to the Pr. CIT(Central). In such a situation, the CIT(Exemptions) cannot ‘see’ the case/assessee in his jurisdiction to take action for registration/cancellation under section 12AA. The CIT(Exemptions) will be incapacitated to issue any communications to the assessee, nor will he be able to generate any DIN in respect of the said assessee.
Therefore, the assumption of jurisdiction by the PCIT(C) over the case for cancelling the registration granted under section 12AA was valid and legally permissible.
List of Cases Reviewed
- Tamil Nadu Cricket Association v. DIT (Exemptions) [2013] 40 taxmann.com 250/221 Taxman 275/360 ITR 633 (Madras)
- Lilavati Kirtilal Mehta Medical Trust v. CIT [2019] 108 taxmann.com 272/178 ITD 338 (Mumbai)[Para 55]
- Welham Boys’ School Society v. CBDT [2007] 158 Taxman 199/285 ITR 74 (UTTARANCHAL)
- State of Rajasthan v. Basant Agrotech India Ltd [2016] 75 taxmann.com 268/388 ITR 81 (Punjab & Haryana)
- Industrial Infrastructure Development Corporation (Gwalior) M.P. Ltd. v. CIT, Gwalior [2018] 90 taxmann.com 281/301 CTR 153/403 ITR 1/253 Taxman 480 (SC)Para 53]
- Sarvodya Pannan 348 ITR 300 (Mad HC)
- Khar Gymkhana [2016] 70 taxmann.com 181/240 Taxman 407/385 ITR 162 (Bombay)
- Maria Social Service Society [2018] 99 taxmann.com 381/408 ITR 462 (Karnataka)[Para 54] Distinguished
List of Cases Referred to
- Aggarwal Vidya Pracharni Sabha v. Pr. CIT, Central [IT Appeal No. 1308 (DELHI) of 2023, dated 8-1-2024] (para 8)
- Wholesales Cloths Merchants Association v. Pr. CIT [IT Appeal No.688/JP/2019, dated 6-1-2021] (para 8)
- Pacific Academy of Higher Education and Research Society v. Pr. CIT (Central) [IT Appeal No. 04(JODH) of 2020, dated 25-1-2023] (para 8)
- Gyan Sagar Education & Charitable Trust v. Asstt. CIT [IT Appeal No. 6054 (Delhi) of 2018, dated 3-9-2020] (para 8)
- CIT (Exemptions) v. Maria Social Service Society[2018] 99 taxmann.com 381/408 ITR 462 (Karnataka) (para 9)
- DIT (Exemptions) v. Khar Gymkhana [2016] 70 taxmann.com 181/240 Taxman 407/385 ITR 162 (Bombay) (para 9)
- Tamil Nadu Cricket Association v. DIT (Exemptions) [2013] 40 taxmann.com 250/221 Taxman 275/360 ITR 633 (Madras) (para 11)
- Lilavati Kirtilal Mehta Medical Trust v. CIT [2019] 108 taxmann.com 272/178 ITD 338 (Mumbai) (para 11)
- Welham Boys’ School Society v. CBDT [2007] 158 Taxman 199/285 ITR 74 (UTTARANCHAL) (para 11)
- Auro Lab. v. ITO [2019] 102 taxmann.com 225/261 Taxman 364/411 ITR 308 (Madras) (para 12)
- Industrial Infrastructure Development Corporation (Gwalior) M.P. Ltd. v. CIT, Gwalior [2018] 90 taxmann.com 281/301 CTR 153/403 ITR 1/253 Taxman 480 (SC) (para 12)
- CIT (Exemptions) v. Jagannath Gupta Family Trust [2019] 102 taxmann.com 34/262 Taxman 313/411 ITR 235 (SC) (para 19)
- Young Indian v. CIT (Exemption) [2019] 111 taxmann.com 235 (Delhi – Trib.) (para 19)
- Vellore Institute of Technology v. CIT (Central-I) [2021] 127 taxmann.com
106/280 Taxman 402/436 ITR 483 (Madras) (para 19), CIT (Exemptions) - Kolkata v. Batanagar Education And Research Trust [2021] 129 taxmann.com 30/436 ITR 501/282 Taxman 1 (SC) (para 19)
- CIT v. Sahara India Financial Corpn. Ltd. [2007] 162 Taxman 357/294 ITR 363 (Delhi) (para 26)
- CIT v. AAR BEE Industries[2013] 36 taxmann.com 308/357 ITR 542 (Delhi) (para 26)
- CIT v. Bidhu Bhusan Sarkar[1967] 63 ITR 278 (SC) (para 26), P.A.
- Ahammed v. Chief CIT[2006] 282 ITR 334/151 Taxman 223 (Kerala) (para 26)
- Legal Initiative For Forest and Environment (LIFE Trust) v. Pr. CIT [S.A. No. 129 (Delhi) of 2024, dated 9-8-2024] (para 37)
- Zile Singh v. State of Haryana (2004) 8 SCC 1 (para 48)
- Prathyusha Educational Trust v. Pr. CIT Central-2 [2019] 108 taxmann.com 385/266 Taxman 105/416 ITR 129 (Madras) (para 51)
- Mumbai Cricket Association v. DIT (Exemption) [2012] 24 taxmann.com 99/138 ITD 338 (Mumbai) (para 52)
- Commissioner of Customs (Import), Mumbai v. Dilip Kumar & Company [2018] 95 taxmann.com 327 (SC) (para 54)
- Sun Export Corporation v. Collector of Customs 1997 taxmann.com 696 (SC) (para 55).
Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.

Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.
The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:
- The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
- All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
- Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
- Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
- All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
- The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
- Font and size that’s easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied

CA | CS | CMA