ITAT Permits Use of Survey Docs. against Assessee Despite Retracted Statement on Oath

  • Blog|News|Income Tax|
  • 2 Min Read
  • By Taxmann
  • |
  • Last Updated on 8 May, 2023


admission on oath

Case Details: Bhimsen Darbarilal Arora v. ACIT - [2023] 150 68 (Surat-Trib.)

Judiciary and Counsel Details

    • Pawan Singh, Judicial Member and Dr. A.L. Saini, Accountant Member
    • Akshay Modi, CA for the Assessee. 
    • Ashok B. Koli, CIT(DR) for the Respondent.

Facts of the Case

Later, the assessee claimed that the survey was illegal, i.e., without jurisdiction, and the statement was retracted after 822 days. However, the Assessing Officer (AO) proceeded to make additions to the income.

On appeal, the CIT(A) confirmed the additions made by AO. Aggrieved by the order, the assessee preferred an instant appeal to the Surat Tribunal.


The Tribunal held that admission on oath could be retracted by the assessee only if the assessee establishes the circumstances such as threat, coercion, undue pressure etc. But in the instant case, no such evidence could be produced by the assessee. After a lapse of more than 822 days, the assessee retracted the statement; therefore, retraction of the statement after more than two years is nothing but an eyewash.

Further, placing the reliance on Supreme Court’s Judgment in the case of Dr. Partap Singh v. Director of Enforcement [1985] 22 Taxman 30 (SC), it was held that the illegality of the search does not vitiate the evidence collected during such illegal search. Even though the search and seizure contravened the provision of section 132, the material seized would be liable to be used against the person from whose custody it was seized.

In the instant case, the addition was made by AO based on the documents and evidence collected during the survey and not based on the statement. The documents found in the survey can be used against the assessee even if the assessee retracts the statement on oath.

Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Everything on Tax and Corporate Laws of India

To subscribe to our weekly newsletter please log in/register on

Author: Taxmann

Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.

The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:

  • The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
  • All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
  • Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
  • Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
  • All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
  • The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
  • Font and size that's easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied