ITAT gives relief to assessee and set-aside penalty for non-furnishing of Form 3CEB
- Blog|News|Transfer Pricing|
- 65 Views
- 2 Min Read
- By Taxmann
- Last Updated on 29 April, 2022
Judiciary and Counsel Details
- Pramod M. Jagtap, Vice-President and T.R. Senthil Kumar, Judicial Member
- Mehul Talera, Adv. for the Appellant.
- V.K. Singh, Sr. DR for the Respondent.
Facts of the Case
Assessee was a partnership firm engaged in the business of industrial waxes and poultry feeds. During the relevant year, it had entered into an international transaction. However, the assessee had not furnished a report in Form no. 3CEB as required under section 92E.
The Assessing Officer (AO) invoked the provisions of section 271BA and levied a penalty. In appellate proceedings, the assessee pleaded that it was not aware of the change in law. However, the CIT(A) rejected the contention and upheld the penalty order. Aggrieved-assessee filed the instant appeal before the Tribunal.
The Tribunal held that a perusal of the section 271BA provisions shows that the Parliament had used the words “may” and not “shall”, thereby making their intentions clear as that levy of penalty is discretionary and not automatic.
The said conclusion is further justified by section 273B. A careful reading of section 273B encompasses that certain penalties “shall” not be imposed in cases where “reasonable cause” is successfully pleaded.
In the instant case, it was seen that the consistent explanation of the assessee had been ignored. The assessee had pleaded ignorance about the legal requirement and had demonstrated that the word “Specified Domestic Transaction” was inserted in section 92E by Finance Act, 2012 w.e.f. 1-4-2013 which was applicable for the first time from the assessment year 2013-14. Though the assessee obtained the Form 3CEB from the Chartered Accountant but had failed to upload it electronically, as it has not aware of the recent changes and amendments in the provision.
Thus, non-uploading of Form 3CEB for the first time was an unintentional bona fide mistake. Accordingly, order imposing and confirming the penalty were to be set aside.
List of Cases Referred to
Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.
Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.
The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:
- The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
- All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
- Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
- Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
- All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
- The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
- Font and size that’s easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied