ITAT allowed sec. 54 relief to woman who purchased new house jointly in name of married daughter & son-in-law
- Blog|Income Tax|News|
- 117 Views
- 2 Min Read
- By Taxmann
- Last Updated on 8 November, 2021
Judiciary and Counsel Details
- Smt. Annapurna Gupta, Accountant Member and R.L. Negi, Judicial Member
- Ashok Khanna, Addl. CIT for the Appellant.
- Parikshit Aggarwal, CA for the Respondent.
Facts of the Case
The assessee sold a residential property for consideration of a certain amount and invested the entire amount in purchasing a new residential property in joint names of assessee with her daughter and son-in-law. The share of three co-owners was 34 percent, 33 percent, and 33 percent, respectively.
The assessee claimed exemption under section 54. However, the Assessing Officer (AO) held that the assessee was entitled to exemption only to the extent of her share in the new residential property, i.e., 34 percent of total consideration invested by her.
On appeal, the CIT(A) allowed the claim on noting the fact that the entire capital gains earned by the assessee had been invested in the new property purchased. AO filed the instant appeal before the Chandigarh Tribunal.
The Tribunal held that the AO had restricted the exemption to 34% of the Long Term Capital Gains without acknowledging the fact that the assessee had invested the entire Long Term Capital Gains in the purchase of residential property
In a similar issue of claim of exemption under section 54B, the Punjab & Haryana High Court, in the case of Dinesh Verma  60 taxmann.com 461/233 Taxman 409 (Punj. & Har.), had ruled that assessee would be entitled to the benefit of exemption on the amount invested by him after the sale of his original property.
Drawing parity from the same, the CIT(A) has rightly allowed the claim of deduction under section 54. The assessee had invested her entire sale consideration in the new property and, therefore, was entitled to exemption of the entire amount of Long Term Capital Gains.
- CIT v. Dinesh Verma  60 taxmann.com 461/233 Taxman 409 (Punj. & Har.) (para 6)
List of Cases Referred to
- CIT v. Dinesh Verma  60 taxmann.com 461/233 Taxman 409 (Punj. & Har.) (para 3).
Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.
Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.
The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:
- The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
- All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
- Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
- Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
- All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
- The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
- Font and size that’s easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied