Incomplete E-Way Bill Due to Technical Error Without Evidence of Tax Evasion Doesn’t Justify Penalty | HC
- News|Blog|GST & Customs|
- 2 Min Read
- By Taxmann
- |
- Last Updated on 9 September, 2024
Case Details: Ram Krishna Gupta v. State of U.P. - [2024] 164 taxmann.com 645 (Allahabad)
Judiciary and Counsel Details
- Piyush Agrawal, J.
-
Nikhil Pandey & Vedika Nath for the Petitioner.
Facts of the Case
The petitioner was transporting goods along with all required documents such as tax invoice, e-way bill and R.R. However, the Part-B of e-way bill was not filled due to technical error and the proceedings were initiated. The department imposed penalty for non-compliance and the same was confirmed by the Appellate Authority. It filed writ petition against the order.
High Court Held
The Honorable High Court noted that there was no finding that there was any discrepancy in quantity and quality of the goods. Further, there was no evidence with regard to evasion of tax and the only allegation was that Part-B of e-way bill was not filled.
Moreover, the Court relied on the judgment in the case of Citykart Retail Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner, Commercial Tax U.P. Gomti Nagar [2022] 144 taxmann.com 155 (Allahabad) and held that mere non-filling of Part-B of e-way bill without any evidence of tax evasion or discrepancy in quantity/quality of goods does not warrant adverse inference or penalty. Therefore, the Court held that the impugned penalty order was liable to be set aside.
List of Cases Reviewed
- Roli Enterprises v. State of U. P., [2024] 158 taxmann.com 468 (Allahabad) – [Para 10 ] followed
- Citykart Retail Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner, Commercial Tax U. P. Gomti Nagar, [2022] 144 taxmann.com 155 (Allahabad) – [Para10 ] followed
List of Cases Referred to
- Roli Enterprises v. State of U.P. [2024] 158 taxmann.com 468/102 GST 11/81 GSTL 444 (Allahabad) (para 4)
- Citykart Retail Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner Commercial Tax U.P. Gomti Nagar [2022] 144 taxmann.com 155 (Allahabad) (para 4).
Disclaimer: The content/information published on the website is only for general information of the user and shall not be construed as legal advice. While the Taxmann has exercised reasonable efforts to ensure the veracity of information/content published, Taxmann shall be under no liability in any manner whatsoever for incorrect information, if any.
Taxmann Publications has a dedicated in-house Research & Editorial Team. This team consists of a team of Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Lawyers. This team works under the guidance and supervision of editor-in-chief Mr Rakesh Bhargava.
The Research and Editorial Team is responsible for developing reliable and accurate content for the readers. The team follows the six-sigma approach to achieve the benchmark of zero error in its publications and research platforms. The team ensures that the following publication guidelines are thoroughly followed while developing the content:
- The statutory material is obtained only from the authorized and reliable sources
- All the latest developments in the judicial and legislative fields are covered
- Prepare the analytical write-ups on current, controversial, and important issues to help the readers to understand the concept and its implications
- Every content published by Taxmann is complete, accurate and lucid
- All evidence-based statements are supported with proper reference to Section, Circular No., Notification No. or citations
- The golden rules of grammar, style and consistency are thoroughly followed
- Font and size that’s easy to read and remain consistent across all imprint and digital publications are applied